Early versus deferred use of CDK4/6 inhibitors in advanced breast cancer: circulating tumor DNA analysis of a randomized phase 3 trial
- PMID: 40908356
- DOI: 10.1038/s41591-025-03935-w
Early versus deferred use of CDK4/6 inhibitors in advanced breast cancer: circulating tumor DNA analysis of a randomized phase 3 trial
Abstract
CDK4/6 inhibitors (CDK4/6i) improve outcome in patients with advanced estrogen receptor-positive, HER2- breast cancer. The phase 3 SONIA trial compared the addition of CDK4/6i to first- versus second-line endocrine therapy for time to disease progression after second-line treatment (progression-free survival after two lines of treatment (PFS2)), as well as for secondary outcomes overall survival, PFS after one line of treatment (PFS1), health-related quality of life (HRQOL), toxicity and cost-effectiveness. No significant difference in PFS2 was observed; however, on an individual patient level this may be different. Using prespecified circulating tumor DNA analyses, we performed an exploratory study to evaluate whether pretreatment circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) levels in plasma can identify patients that benefit from CDK4/6i during their first-line treatment. Cell free DNA before start of first-line treatment from 409 female patients participating in SONIA was analyzed with the modified fast aneuploidy screening test-sequencing system. This assay yields a genome-wide aneuploidy score, indicative of ctDNA levels. Cox proportional hazard analyses for PFS1 and PFS2 were performed separately for the ctDNA high group (aneuploidy score ≥ 5) and the ctDNA low group (aneuploidy score < 5). In total, 141 of the 409 included patients had a high genome-wide aneuploidy score at baseline. PFS2 in the first- compared to the second-line CDK4/6i strategy showed hazard ratios of 0.58 (95% confidence interval 0.38-0.88) and 1.36 (95% confidence interval 0.95-1.96) in the high and low aneuploidy group, respectively. A significant interaction was demonstrated between treatment strategy and aneuploidy score for PFS2 (P = 0.004). In conclusion, this study demonstrated that pretreatment ctDNA levels can be used to identify patients that benefit from first-line CDK4/6i treatment. ClinicalTrials.gov registration: NCT03425838 .
© 2025. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature America, Inc.
Conflict of interest statement
Competing interests: Institutional research grant support was received from the following: Novartis (I.R.K. and G.S.S.); Gilead (I.R.K.); Agendia and AstraZeneca (G.S.S. and A.J.); Merck (G.S.S. and J.W.M.M.); Roche and Seasgen (G.S.S.); Bayer, Menarini and Tzu Genomics (J.W.M.M.) and Pfizer (A.J. and S.M.W.). Consultancy was received from Biovica, Novaratis and Seagen (G.S.S.) and Novartis (J.W.M.M.). Participation on the advisory board of AstraZeneca (A.J.). The other authors declare no competing interests.
References
-
- Finn, R. S. et al. Palbociclib and letrozole in advanced breast cancer. N. Engl. J. Med. 375, 1925–1936 (2016). - PubMed
-
- Hortobagyi, G. N. et al. Updated results from MONALEESA-2, a phase III trial of first-line ribociclib plus letrozole versus placebo plus letrozole in hormone receptor-positive, HER2-negative advanced breast cancer. Ann. Oncol. 29, 1541–1547 (2018). - PubMed
-
- Tripathy, D. et al. Ribociclib plus endocrine therapy for premenopausal women with hormone-receptor-positive, advanced breast cancer (MONALEESA-7): a randomised phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol. 19, 904–915 (2018). - PubMed
-
- Cristofanilli, M. et al. Fulvestrant plus palbociclib versus fulvestrant plus placebo for treatment of hormone-receptor-positive, HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer that progressed on previous endocrine therapy (PALOMA-3): final analysis of the multicentre, double-blind, phase 3 randomised controlled trial. Lancet Oncol. 17, 425–439 (2016). - PubMed
Associated data
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Research Materials
Miscellaneous