Immune checkpoint inhibitors in gynecologic oncology: Current status and perspectives
- PMID: 40908776
- PMCID: PMC12411819
- DOI: 10.1002/ijgo.70280
Immune checkpoint inhibitors in gynecologic oncology: Current status and perspectives
Abstract
Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have transformed cancer treatment by leveraging the immune system's capacity to fight gynecologic cancer. This review summarizes the current status and future perspectives of ICIs in the treatment of cervical, endometrial, and ovarian cancers and rare tumors. ICIs have demonstrated significant efficacy in tumors with high tumor mutational burden and immune markers such as PD-L1 expression and microsatellite instability. In cervical cancer, the integration of ICIs has shown promise at various stages of treatment, including advanced and recurrent settings. In endometrial cancer, molecular classification has facilitated targeted immunotherapy strategies, with notable success in mismatch repair-deficient (dMMR) tumors. However, challenges remain in the treatment of microsatellite stable endometrial and epithelial ovarian cancers due to their relatively low immunogenicity. Combination therapies, including ICIs with angiogenesis inhibitors, poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitors, or chemotherapy, are being actively investigated to improve response rates. Several phase II and case series showed promising response to ICIs in vulvar/vaginal cancer and gestational trophoblastic neoplasia, though the efficacy in genital tract melanoma is still unclear. Despite these advances, the management of immune-related adverse events and the identification of reliable biomarkers for patient selection remain critical. ICIs are poised to redefine the therapeutic landscape of gynecologic oncology, offering hope for improved outcomes and personalized treatment strategies.
Keywords: cervical cancer; endometrial cancer; immune checkpoint inhibitors; ovarian cancer.
© 2025 The Author(s). International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors have no conflicts of interest.
Figures
References
-
- Santoro A, Angelico G, Inzani F, et al. The emerging and challenging role of PD‐L1 in patients with gynecological cancers: an updating review with clinico‐pathological considerations. Gynecol Oncol. 2024;184:57‐66. - PubMed
-
- Chen DS, Mellman I. Elements of cancer immunity and the cancer‐immune set point. Nature. 2017;541:321‐330. - PubMed
-
- Lorusso D, Xiang Y, Hasegawa K, et al. Pembrolizumab or placebo with chemoradiotherapy followed by pembrolizumab or placebo for newly diagnosed, high‐risk, locally advanced cervical cancer (ENGOT‐cx11/GOG‐3047/KEYNOTE‐A18): a randomised, double‐blind, phase 3 clinical trial. Lancet. 2024;403:1341‐1350. - PubMed
-
- Oaknin A, Gladieff L, Martinez‐Garcia J, et al. Atezolizumab plus bevacizumab and chemotherapy for metastatic, persistent, or recurrent cervical cancer (BEATcc): a randomised, open‐label, phase 3 trial. Lancet. 2024;403:31‐43. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Research Materials