Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2025 Mar 11:12:791.
doi: 10.12688/f1000research.134942.3. eCollection 2023.

Comparative evaluation of fracture resistance of re-attached teeth using self-adhesive bioactive flowable composite after preconditioning the fractured coronal fragments with different remineralizing agents

Affiliations
Comparative Study

Comparative evaluation of fracture resistance of re-attached teeth using self-adhesive bioactive flowable composite after preconditioning the fractured coronal fragments with different remineralizing agents

Pratik Rathod et al. F1000Res. .

Abstract

One of the common forms of dental injury is anterior crown fractures, which mainly affect teenagers and young adults. Fractures of the coronal portion of the permanent incisors characterize 18-22% of total traumatic injuries to dental hard tissues, of which 96% of them comprise the maxillary incisors. An uncomplicated fracture of the crown is one of the most common types of dental traumatic injury. Dental trauma has an emotional impact on the patient's overall health and can seriously harm to the dentition. The treatment, as well as prognosis of the fracture of the coronal portion, is a major challenge for a dentist because it has to accomplish various parameters like the need to obtain an aesthetical result that approaches itself to its natural form and measurement, opaqueness and translucency of the original tooth structure in obtaining an effective restoration. It is suggested that reattachment of the fractured fragment is the best procedure for restoring an uncomplicated crown fracture, if a fragment is present. Fragment reattachment offers superior aesthetics and function compared to composite restorations, preserving the tooth's natural characteristics, like the tooth's true shape, colour, intensity, and surface texture. Success depends on the fracture line's direction and location; simple enamel or enamel-dentin fractures are ideal. However, reattached fragments remain vulnerable to subsequent trauma. The reattached fragments are susceptible to further fracture when the restored teeth undergo further trauma. The resistance of the fractured teeth that have been reattached is the subject of the majority of concerns. Preconditioning the fractured fragments with remineralizing agents may aid in hydration. Thus, a study will be conducted to evaluate the resistance of the fracture of a tooth that is reattached and pre-treated with remineralizing agents such as sodium fluoride and casein phosphopeptide-amorphous calcium phosphate and further reattached using one of the self-adhesive bioactive composite.

Keywords: Bioactive; Casein phosphopeptide–amorphous calcium phosphate; Fracture resistance.; Reattachment technique; Sodium fluoride; Traumatic dental injury; Uncomplicated crown fracture.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

No competing interests were disclosed.

Similar articles

References

    1. Shirani F, Malekipour MR, Tahririan D, et al. : Effect of storage environment on the bond strength of reattachment of crown fragments to fractured teeth. J. Conserv. Dent. 2011 Jul 1;14(3):269–272. 10.4103/0972-0707.85813 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Petersson EE, Andersson L, Sörensen S: Traumatic oral vs non-oral injuries. Swed. Dent. J. 1997;21(1–2):55–68. - PubMed
    1. Diangelis AJ, Andreasen JO, Ebeleseder KA, et al. : International Association of Dental Traumatology guidelines for the management of traumatic dental injuries: 1. Fractures and luxations of permanent teeth. Dent. Traumatol. Off. Publ. Int. Assoc. Dent. Traumatol. 2012 Feb;28(1):2–12. 10.1111/j.1600-9657.2011.01103.x - DOI - PubMed
    1. Madhubala A, Tewari N, Mathur VP, et al. : Comparative evaluation of fracture resistance using two rehydration protocols for fragment reattachment in uncomplicated crown fractures. Dent. Traumatol. Off. Publ. Int. Assoc. Dent. Traumatol. 2019 Jun;35(3):199–203. 10.1111/edt.12473 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Andreasen FM, Norén JG, Andreasen JO, et al. : Long-term survival of fragment bonding in the treatment of fractured crowns: a multicenter clinical study. Quintessence Int. Berl. Ger. 1985. 1995 Oct;26(10):669–681. - PubMed

Publication types

Substances

LinkOut - more resources