Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2025 Aug 20:16:1626223.
doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1626223. eCollection 2025.

New methods, old questions: advancing the study of unconscious perception

Affiliations
Review

New methods, old questions: advancing the study of unconscious perception

Mikel Jimenez et al. Front Psychol. .

Abstract

Since the early experimental studies of the late 19th century, research on unconscious perception has been shaped by persistent methodological challenges and evolving experimental approaches aimed at demonstrating perception without awareness. In this review, we will discuss some of the most relevant challenges researchers have faced in demonstrating unconscious perception, and examine how different measures of awareness (e.g., objective vs. subjective) yield different awareness thresholds-often leading to two alternative approaches to demonstrating unconscious perception. We will further explore new methodologies in the field, such as regression-based Bayesian modeling, sensitivity vs. awareness (SvA) curves derived from General Recognition Theory (GRT), the liminal-prime paradigm, and two-interval forced choice (2IFC) designs. Finally, we emphasize the need for brain-based approaches to unconscious perception and discussed some promising studies in this area, while also highlighting the role of individual differences and alternative frameworks such as predictive coding and active inference views in future research. Overall, the new approaches and methodologies discussed here will advance the field by addressing the challenges inherent in demonstrating cognition in the absence of awareness.

Keywords: awareness; awareness thresholds; consciousness; unconscious perception; visual masking.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest. The author(s) declared that they were an editorial board member of Frontiers, at the time of submission. This had no impact on the peer review process and the final decision.

References

    1. Adams J. K. (1957). Laboratory studies of behavior without awareness. Psychol. Bull. 54, 383–405. doi: 10.1037/h0043350, PMID: - DOI - PubMed
    1. Amerio P., Michel M., Goerttler S., Peters M. A., Cleeremans A. (2023). Featural blindsight in a 2-interval forced-choice task. OSF [Preprint]. doi: 10.31234/osf.io/jcae4 - DOI
    1. Ansorge U., Fuchs I., Khalid S., Kunde W. (2011). No conflict control in the absence of awareness. Psychol. Res. 75, 351–365. doi: 10.1007/s00426-010-0313-4, PMID: - DOI - PubMed
    1. Avneon M., Lamy D. (2018). Reexamining unconscious response priming: a liminal-prime paradigm. Conscious. Cogn. 59, 87–103. doi: 10.1016/j.concog.2017.12.006, PMID: - DOI - PubMed
    1. Bachmann T. (2015). Unmasking the pitfalls of the masking method in consciousness research. Behav. Methods Conscious. Res. 2015, 49–76. doi: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199688890.003.0004 - DOI

LinkOut - more resources