Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Sep 1;18(8):895-909.
doi: 10.70252/LGER1776. eCollection 2025.

Biddle Physical Ability Test (BPAT) Performance by Attempt in Southern California Structural Firefighter Candidates

Affiliations

Biddle Physical Ability Test (BPAT) Performance by Attempt in Southern California Structural Firefighter Candidates

Robert G Lockie et al. Int J Exerc Sci. .

Abstract

The Biddle Physical Ability Test (BPAT) is a job task simulation that must be completed in ≤9:34 min:s by structural firefighter candidates to be accepted to a fire training academy. This study investigated the influence of prior attempts on BPAT time. Retrospective analysis was conducted on 1435 male and 72 female candidates. All participants received equivalent instruction on how to complete the BPAT which incorporated: dry hose drag; charged hose drag; halyard raise; roof walk; attic crawl; roof ventilation; victim removal; ladder removal and carry; stair climb with hose bundle; crawling search; stair climb with air bottles; and hose hoist. Candidates in the dataset were split into 1st, 2nd, 3rd, 4th, 5th, and ≥6th attempt groups. A one-way ANOVA, with Bonferroni post hoc, compared groups in BPAT time (all times combined and passing times only; p≤0.05). All candidates who failed to meet time requirements, did not finish, or were disqualified, were recorded. The 1st, 2nd, and 3rd attempt groups were significantly (p≤0.007) slower than the 4th, 5th, and ≥6th attempt groups when considering all and passing times. The percentage of candidates that did not pass the BPAT relative to their attempt group was: 1st = 13%; 2nd = 6%; 3rd = 7%; 4th = 2%; 5th = 0%; ≥6th = <1%. Most candidates passed the BPAT. However, BPAT practice based on previous attempts generally led to faster times and more candidates passing. It could be beneficial for candidates to attend practice courses and fitness training sessions to improve BPAT performance.

Keywords: Fire department; firefighting; job task; occupational testing; physical ability test; tactical.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Box plots of Biddle Physical Ability Test (BPAT) times by attempt for all candidates who recorded a time (pass and fails). * Significantly (p ≤ 0.05) slower than all other attempt groups. # Significantly (p ≤ 0.05) slower than the 4th, 5th, and ≥6th attempt groups. § Significantly (p ≤ 0.05) slower than the ≥6th attempt group.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Box plots of Biddle Physical Ability Test (BPAT) times by attempt (passing times only). * Significantly (p ≤ 0.05) slower than all other attempt groups. # Significantly (p ≤ 0.05) slower than the 4th, 5th, and ≥6th attempt groups. § Significantly (p ≤ 0.05) slower than the ≥6th attempt group.

References

    1. Rhea MR, Alvar BA, Gray R. Physical fitness and job performance of firefighters. J Strength Cond Res. 2004;18(2):348–352. doi: 10.1519/r-12812.1. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Sheaff AK, Bennett A, Hanson ED, et al. Physiological determinants of the Candidate Physical Ability Test in firefighters. J Strength Cond Res. 2010;24(11):3112–3122. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0b013e3181f0a8d5. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Fyock-Martin MB, Erickson EK, Hautz AH, et al. What do firefighting ability tests tell us about firefighter physical fitness? A systematic review of the current evidence. J Strength Cond Res. 2020;34(7):2093–2103. doi: 10.1519/jsc.0000000000003577. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Michaelides MA, Parpa KM, Henry LJ, Thompson GB, Brown BS. Assessment of physical fitness aspects and their relationship to firefighters’ job abilities. J Strength Cond Res. 2011;25(4):956–965. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0b013e3181cc23ea. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Carlton SD, Orr RM. The impact of occupational load carriage on carrier mobility: A critical review of the literature. Int J Occup Saf Ergon. 2014;20(1):33–41. doi: 10.1080/10803548.2014.11077025. - DOI - PubMed