Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Sep 25;68(18):19122-19142.
doi: 10.1021/acs.jmedchem.5c01184. Epub 2025 Sep 5.

Development of Optimized Exatecan-Based Immunoconjugates with Potent Antitumor Efficacy in HER2-Positive Breast Cancer

Affiliations

Development of Optimized Exatecan-Based Immunoconjugates with Potent Antitumor Efficacy in HER2-Positive Breast Cancer

Etienne Auvert et al. J Med Chem. .

Abstract

The prognosis of human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-positive breast cancer has significantly improved with the advent of anti-HER2 therapies, especially antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs). In this field, ADCs, like trastuzumab deruxtecan (T-DXd), using camptothecin analogs, represent a promising strategy. However, T-DXd can induce resistance and serious adverse effects, potentially driven by a non-specific Fcγ receptor-mediated endocytosis. Here, we report the development of novel HER2-targeting conjugates, using the camptothecin derivative exatecan and a linker optimized to control hydrophobicity. Three formats were evaluated: a high drug-to-antibody ratio (DAR) 8 IgG-based ADC (IgG(8)-EXA), and two DAR 4 Fc-free constructs (Mb(4)-EXA and Db(4)-EXA). Thus, IgG(8)-EXA and Mb(4)-EXA displayed potent, specific cytotoxicity against HER2-positive breast cancer cells and strong antitumor activity in vivo. Notably, IgG(8)-EXA exhibited a favorable pharmacokinetic profile, despite its high DAR, supporting the potential of this drug-linker design. These two conjugates represent promising candidates for further preclinical development.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

1
1
Bioconjugation process, exatecan drug-linker structure, and mechanism of exatecan release from the immunoconjugates developed in this study.
1
1. Synthetic Route for Intermediate 6
2
2. Synthetic Route for Exatecan Drug-Linker 12
2
2
Schematic representations of immunoconjugates 1316.
3
3
HER2 binding recognition measured by indirect ELISA of: (A) IgG(8)-EXA (13) (blue curve) in comparison to T-DXd (red curve), (B) Mb(4)-EXA (14) (green curve), and (C) Db(4)-EXA (15) (light blue curve), in comparison to the nonconjugated entities (black curves) trastuzumab (IgG(8)), minibody (Mb(4)) and diabody (Db(4)), respectively.
4
4
Internalization of immunoconjugates in SK-BR-3 (HER2-positive) cells. (A) Histogram of flow cytometry for cells incubated with ppL-PE alone (gray) or IgGirr(8)-EXA (16) (red), IgG(8)-EXA (13) (dark blue), Mb(4)-EXA (14) (green), Db(4)-EXA (15) (light blue), and T-DXd (orange) after labeling with ppL-PE (exposure time = 24 h at 37 °C). Asterisks indicate significant differences between two groups using a Tukey’s test (**p < 0.01, ****p < 0.0001). (B) Fluorescence microscopy images of SK-BR-3 cells after incubation during 24 h at 37 °C with ppL-PE alone or IgGirr(8)-EXA, T-DXd, IgG(8)-EXA, Mb(4)-EXA and Db(4)-EXA (preincubated with ppL-PE). Scale bar: 100 μm.
5
5
In vitro cytotoxic activity of IgGirr(8)-EXA (16) (red), IgG(8)-EXA (13) (dark blue), Mb(4)-EXA (14) (green), Db(4)-EXA (15) (light blue), T-DXd (orange) and free exatecan (black curve) after 5 days of incubation at 37 °C on SK-BR-3 and MDA-MB-468 cancer cell lines (CellTiter Glo assay) (A). HER2 cell surface expression in breast tumor cell lines as assayed by flow cytometry (B).
6
6
Comparison of average DAR variation for IgG(8)-EXA (red) and T-DXd (green) upon incubation over 192 h in mouse (A) and human (B) serum, assessed by affinity capture and LC-MS analysis. Values are normalized against DAR measured at time 0.
7
7
Ex vivo tissue/organ biodistribution of [125I]­I-T-DXd (A, B) and [125I]­I-IgG­(8)-EXA ([ 125 I]­13) (C, D) in female SCID CB17 mice bearing subcutaneous BT-474-SCID tumors at 6 h, 24 h, 48 h, 3 d, 5 d, and 11 d p.i. (n = 4 per time point). A: The mice were injected (i.v.) with 3.42 ± 0.08 or 11.13 ± 0.44 MBq (5 d group, n = 2 and 4 respectively) of [125I]­I-T-DXd. The radioactivity was measured using a γ-counter: bars represent the mean of %ID/g; the error bars are standard deviation (SD) from the mean. B: Table represents the %ID in the thyroïd. C: The mice were injected (i.v.) with 3.91 ± 0.57 or 15.49 ± 0.01 MBq (5 d group, n = 2 and 4, respectively) of [125I]­I-IgG­(8)-EXA ([125I]13). The radioactivity was measured by using a γ-counter. A: bars represent the mean of %ID/g; the error bars are standard deviation (SD) from the mean. D: Table represents the %ID in the thyroïd. (B.A.T. represents the brown adipose tissue).
8
8
Ex vivo tumor biodistribution (%ID/g) of the two radioiodinated immunoconjugates in female SCID CB17 mice bearing subcutaneous BT-474-SCID grafts. All mice were injected (i.v.) with (i) 3.91 ± 0.57 or 15.49 ± 0.01 MBq (5 d group, n = 2 and 4, respectively) of [125I]­I-IgG­(8)-EXA ([125I]13, red bars) or (ii) 3.42 ± 0.08 or 11.13 ± 0.44 MBq (5 d group, n = 2 and 4, respectively) of [125I]­I-T-DXd (green bars). The error bars are the standard deviation (SD) from the mean. For all radioiodinated immunoconjugates, 4 per time point. A: the bars represent the mean of %ID/g of the tumor. B: the bars represent the average ratio of %ID/g between the tumor and blood (T/B). C: the bars represent the average ratio of %ID/g between tumor and muscle (T/M).
9
9
Representative SPECT-CT (coronal section) images of a mouse bearing orthotopic BT-474-SCID tumor injected (i.v.) with 15 MBq of [125I]­I-IgG­(8)-EXA ([125I]13) and imaged at different time points p.i. The arrow indicates the location of the BT-474-SCID tumor (320 mm3).
10
10
Schematic representation of administration schedule (A). Tumoral volume evolution of mice bearing HER2-positive breast cancer tumors after intravenous injection of PBS (control) or five different treatments. Arrows indicate the day of treatment administration for each group. T-DXd (single dose at 10 mg/kg equivalent to 65 nmol/kg); Mb(4)-EXA (4 injections at 5.36 mg/kg equivalent to 62 nmol/kg); IgG(8)-EXA 5 (single dose at 5 mg/kg equivalent to 31 nmol/kg); IgG(8)-EXA 10 (single dose at 10 mg/kg equivalent to 62 nmol/kg); IgG(8)-EXA 2 × 10 (2 injections at 10 mg/kg equivalent to 124 nmol/kg) (B).

References

    1. Bray F., Laversanne M., Sung H., Ferlay J., Siegel R. L., Soerjomataram I., Jemal A.. Global Cancer Statistics 2022: GLOBOCAN Estimates of Incidence and Mortality Worldwide for 36 Cancers in 185 Countries. CA. Cancer J. Clin. 2024;74(3):229–263. doi: 10.3322/caac.21834. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Pernas S., Barroso-Sousa R., Tolaney S. M.. Optimal Treatment of Early Stage HER2-Positive Breast Cancer. Cancer. 2018;124(23):4455–4466. doi: 10.1002/cncr.31657. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Burstein H. J.. The Distinctive Nature of HER2-Positive Breast Cancers. N. Engl. J. Med. 2005;353(16):1652–1654. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp058197. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Moasser M. M.. The Oncogene HER2; Its Signaling and Transforming Functions and Its Role in Human Cancer Pathogenesis. Oncogene. 2007;26(45):6469–6487. doi: 10.1038/sj.onc.1210477. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Slamon D. J., Clark G. M., Wong S. G., Levin W. J., Ullrich A., Mcguire W. L.. Correlation Amplification. Science (80-.) 1987;235(4785):177–182. doi: 10.1126/science.3798106. - DOI - PubMed

MeSH terms