An evaluation of the use of 3D-printed anatomical models in anatomy education
- PMID: 40913166
- DOI: 10.1007/s00276-025-03704-x
An evaluation of the use of 3D-printed anatomical models in anatomy education
Abstract
Introduction: Medical students primarily learn anatomy through lectures and atlases. Since mastering anatomy requires spatial visualization, dissection of cadavers has traditionally been regarded as the most effective approach in this discipline. Unfortunately, there are many drawbacks to this method, including accessibility issues. Nowadays, the use of 3D printing and other advanced technologies as educational tools in anatomy courses has been on the rise and they can play an extremely beneficial role in this regard. This study sought to evaluate the effectiveness of 3D printed anatomical models for student education.
Materials & methods: The selected anatomical models were scanned using a 3D scanner, taking into account their 3D features and their application in hands-on learning settings. Minor modifications were made to the scanned files with the help of computer software before they were printed. Ultimately, the models were assessed by faculty members and students from different disciplines.
Results: Once the models were prepared, they were given to various groups, including professors, medical students, MSc anatomy students, surgery residents, and BSc radiology students for evaluation. The opinions of these groups were then compared across two sets of models, and their assessments were analyzed in various cases. The feedback from four groups of students i.e. medical students, MSc anatomy students, surgery residents, and BSc radiology students indicated a notable contrast with the feedback from the professors' group.
Conclusion: 3D printed models serve as valuable resources for teaching and learning anatomy from diverse viewpoints, catering to learners at different levels of study. Nevertheless, despite the usefulness of 3D models, anatomy professors believe that natural specimens associated with cadavers remain the most essential teaching resource for anatomy.
Keywords: 3D printing; 3D scanning; Anatomical models; Anatomy education.
© 2025. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag France SAS, part of Springer Nature.
Conflict of interest statement
Declarations. Conflict of interest: The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest. Ethical approval: This study was approved by Ethical Committee of Kashan University of Medical Sciences (ethic code, IR.KAUMS. NUHEPM.REC.1402.019).
Similar articles
-
Prescription of Controlled Substances: Benefits and Risks.2025 Jul 6. In: StatPearls [Internet]. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2025 Jan–. 2025 Jul 6. In: StatPearls [Internet]. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2025 Jan–. PMID: 30726003 Free Books & Documents.
-
A new classmate in anatomy education: 3D anatomical modeling medical students' engagement on learning through self-prepared anatomical models.Anat Sci Educ. 2025 Jul;18(7):727-737. doi: 10.1002/ase.70070. Epub 2025 Jun 17. Anat Sci Educ. 2025. PMID: 40528565 Free PMC article. Review.
-
A Comprehensive and Modality Diverse Cervical Spine and Back Musculoskeletal Physical Exam Curriculum for Medical Students.J Educ Teach Emerg Med. 2025 Jul 31;10(3):SG1-SG8. doi: 10.21980/J8RQ0N. eCollection 2025 Jul. J Educ Teach Emerg Med. 2025. PMID: 40766941 Free PMC article.
-
The educational effects of portfolios on undergraduate student learning: a Best Evidence Medical Education (BEME) systematic review. BEME Guide No. 11.Med Teach. 2009 Apr;31(4):282-98. doi: 10.1080/01421590902889897. Med Teach. 2009. PMID: 19404891
-
Young anatomists perceptions of aorta-celiac trunk models and their use in anatomical education training.Surg Radiol Anat. 2025 Sep 3;47(1):198. doi: 10.1007/s00276-025-03706-9. Surg Radiol Anat. 2025. PMID: 40903531
References
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical