Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Sep 5.
doi: 10.1038/s41591-025-03945-8. Online ahead of print.

Feasibility and clinical utility of expanded genomic newborn screening in the Early Check program

Affiliations

Feasibility and clinical utility of expanded genomic newborn screening in the Early Check program

Heidi L Cope et al. Nat Med. .

Abstract

Although genomic sequencing presents groundbreaking newborn screening (NBS) opportunities, critical feasibility and utility questions remain. Here we present initial results from the Early Check program-an observational study assessing the feasibility and clinical utility of genomic NBS in North Carolina. Recruitment was statewide through mailed letters with electronic consent. Genome sequencing with analysis of 169 high actionability genes (plus 29 optional lower actionability genes) was performed using residual NBS dried blood spots. In 8 months, 1,979 newborns were screened, with 50 (2.5%) screen positives. Negative results were returned electronically, positive results by genetic counselors. Twenty-eight results (55%) were true positives, all received anticipatory guidance, surveillance and management recommendations, and referral to specialists as appropriate. We report technical feasibility and preliminary clinical utility finding, along with interpretation and follow-up challenges that hinder public health implementation. We propose standardized terminology to facilitate cross-study comparisons and accurate characterization of genomic NBS outcomes.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: R.S.Z., S.F.S., A.B., A.J.G., K.G.L., K.G.M., K.M., C.K., K.S.H. and P.K. were employees of GeneDx, LLC at the time of this study and may have held company stock. All RTI authors (H.L.C., K.S.K., H.E.F., A.Y.G., A.N.F., B.A.M., B.W., R.R.M., D.B.B.J., A.C.W., M.R. and H.L.P.) were supported in this research by Janssen Pharmaceuticals (July 2021 to July 2022), Breakthrough T1D (formerly JDRF International), the Leona M. and Harry B. Helmsley Charitable Trust, Travere Therapeutics and Orchard Therapeutics. UNC authors (E.R.J., J.A.S. and C.M.P.) were supported in this research by Breakthrough T1D (formerly JDRF International). The other authors declare no competing interests.

References

    1. Bick, D. et al. Newborn screening by genomic sequencing: opportunities and challenges. Int. J. Neonatal Screen. 8, 40 (2022). - PubMed - PMC
    1. Minten, T. et al. Data-driven consideration of genetic disorders for global genomic newborn screening programs. Genet. Med. 27, 101443 (2025). - PubMed
    1. Boemer, F. et al. Population-based, first-tier genomic newborn screening in the maternity ward. Nat. Med. 31, 1339–1350 (2025). - PubMed - PMC
    1. Ziegler, A. et al. Expanded newborn screening using genome sequencing for early actionable conditions. JAMA 333, 232–240 (2024). - PMC
    1. Ceyhan-Birsoy, O. et al. Interpretation of genomic sequencing results in healthy and ill newborns: results from the BabySeq project. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 104, 76–93 (2019). - PubMed - PMC