Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Sep 7.
doi: 10.1007/s10943-025-02443-y. Online ahead of print.

Roman Catholic Religious Affiliation and Reactions to the Initial Stage of the COVID-19 Pandemic in Poland

Affiliations

Roman Catholic Religious Affiliation and Reactions to the Initial Stage of the COVID-19 Pandemic in Poland

John B Nezlek et al. J Relig Health. .

Abstract

The present study examined responses to COVID-19 at the beginning of the pandemic, April 2020, among a representative sample of 880 Poles. Participants described their religious beliefs, their emotional reactions to the pandemic, the changes they had made in their behavior since the onset of the pandemic, and their political orientation (left-right). Roman Catholics felt more threatened by the pandemic than non-believers, and Catholics reacted more strongly to the pandemic than non-believers in terms of feeling scared, paralyzed by fear, panicked, fearful, sad, woebegone, and lost, whereas there were no such differences on other emotional reactions. Compared to non-believers, Catholics changed their behavior to be more compliant with public health guidelines and changed some behaviors that were not recommended by public health officials but were popular (e.g., stocking up on food and on cleaning products). There were however, no differences between the two groups in terms of wearing masks, limiting leaving home, and avoiding contact with those who were ill. Catholics had weaker intentions to get vaccinated than non-believers. Catholics' political orientation was more right-wing than non-believers' orientation, and the difference in vaccination intentions between Catholics and non-believers disappeared after controlling for differences in political orientation. Controlling for political orientation did not change the results of the analyses of emotional reactions and behavioral changes.

Keywords: COVID-19; Catholicism; Pandemic; Political orientation; Psychological distress; Religiosity; Vaccine hesitancy.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declarations. Competing interests: The authors have no relevant financial or non-financial interests to disclose. Ethics Approval: This study was performed in line with the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki. Approval was granted by the Komisja Etyki ds. Badań Naukowych Uniwersytetu Humianistycznospołecznego SWPS. Wydziału Psychologii i Prawa w Poznaniu [Research Ethics Committee of the SWPS University of Social Sciences and Humanities. Faculty of Psychology and Law in Poznań], 8 March, 2020, protocol 2020-18-11.

Similar articles

References

    1. Adu, P., Poopola, T., Medvedev, O. N., Collings, S., Mbinta, J., Aspin, C., & Simpson, C. R. (2023). Implications for COVID-19 vaccine uptake: A systematic review. Journal of Infection and Public Health, 16(3), 441–466. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jiph.2023.01.020 - DOI - PubMed - PMC
    1. Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50, 179–211. https://doi.org/10.1080/10410236.2018.1493416 - DOI
    1. Ayub, S., Anugwom, G. O., Basiru, T., Sachdeva, V., Muhammad, N., Bachu, A., Trudeau, M., Gulati, G., Sullivan, A., Ahmed, S., & Jain, L. (2023). Bridging science and spirituality: The intersection of religion and public health in the COVID-19 pandemic. Frontiers in Psychiatry, 14, 1183234. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2023.1183234 - DOI - PubMed - PMC
    1. Azevedo, F., & Jost, J. T. (2021). The ideological basis of antiscientific attitudes: Effects of authoritarianism, conservatism, religiosity, social dominance, and system justification. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 24(4), 518–549. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368430221990104 - DOI
    1. Benjamini, Y., & Hochberg, J. (1995). Controlling the false discovery rate—A practical and powerful approach to multiple testing. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series b: Methodological, 57(1), 289–300. https://doi.org/10.2307/2346101 - DOI

LinkOut - more resources