Optimising Guide RNA Production for Multiplexed Cas9-Targeted Nanopore Sequencing to Detect Pathogens
- PMID: 40914913
- DOI: 10.1007/s12033-025-01510-9
Optimising Guide RNA Production for Multiplexed Cas9-Targeted Nanopore Sequencing to Detect Pathogens
Abstract
In agriculture, biosecurity, and human health, the rapid and accurate detection of pathogens and pests is crucial. Our study investigates the sensitivity and practicality of six guide RNA (gRNA) production methods for use in Nanopore Cas9-targeted sequencing (nCATS), focusing on their implications for multiplexed pathogen and pest detection. Each production method generated a library of eight gRNAs capable of excising ~ 1.6 kb fragments of the 5.8S_rRNA-ITS2-28S_rRNA regions of five economically significant wheat fungal pathogens. Through comparative analysis, we evaluated the efficacy of commercially synthesised and in-house in vitro-transcribed gRNAs, assessing their impact on sequencing enrichment outcomes. Our findings highlight differences amongst the methods in terms of gRNA yield, integrity, performance, and costs. Our best performing gRNA production method was able to successfully identify all target sequences across the 0.96 to 8.4 pg ranges we tested with coverage ranging from 66 to 2037X. This study highlights the challenges and opportunities in implementing nCATS for multiplexed pathogen and pest detection, offering insights into the development of cost-effective and reliable gRNA production strategies for nCATS.
Keywords: CRISPR-Cas9; Guide RNA; Multiplexing; NCATS; Nanopore; Pathogen; Pest; Targeted.
© 2025. Crown.
Conflict of interest statement
Declarations. Conflict of interests: The authors declare no competing interests.
References
-
- Anand, M. (2018). A systems approach to agricultural biosecurity. Health Security, 16(1), 58–68. https://doi.org/10.1089/hs.2017.0035 - DOI - PubMed
-
- Rajapaksha, P., Elbourne, A., Gangadoo, S., Brown, R., Cozzolino, D., & Chapman, J. (2019). A review of methods for the detection of pathogenic microorganisms. The Analyst, 144(2), 396–411. https://doi.org/10.1039/c8an01488d . PubMed PMID: 30468217. - DOI - PubMed
-
- Bursle, E., & Robson, J. (2016). Non-culture methods for detecting infection. Australian Prescriber, 39(5), 171–175. https://doi.org/10.18773/austprescr.2016.059 . 20161001. - DOI - PubMed - PMC
-
- Yang, S., & Rothman, R. E. (2004). PCR-based diagnostics for infectious diseases: Uses, limitations, and future applications in acute-care settings. The Lancet Infectious Diseases, 4(6), 337–348. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1473-3099(04)01044-8 - DOI - PubMed - PMC
-
- Cheng, Y.-W., Stefaniuk, C., & Jakubowski, M. A. (2019). Real-time PCR and targeted next-generation sequencing in the detection of low level EGFR mutations: Instructive case analyses. Respiratory Medicine Case Reports, 28, Article 100901. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rmcr.2019.100901 - DOI - PubMed - PMC
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
