Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Aug 21:13:1617776.
doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2025.1617776. eCollection 2025.

Precision public health alliances as a model and method for community engagement

Affiliations

Precision public health alliances as a model and method for community engagement

Margaret L McGladrey et al. Front Public Health. .

Abstract

Using precision analytics approaches with population health data helps identify localized patterns of social determinants and comorbidities, supporting the design of tailored interventions. The University of Kentucky College of Public Health (UKCPH) and UK King's Daughters (UKKD) have partnered to create a Precision Public Health Alliance (PPHA) applying precision analytics to UKKD electronic health records (EHR) as well as secondary datasets to map social, demographic, and clinical comorbidity factors onto colorectal cancer (CRC) screening data in UKKD's rural service area (the northeastern Kentucky counties of Boyd, Carter, Greenup, and Lawrence and southeast Ohio county of Lawrence). In addition to UKKD and UKCPH clinicians and researchers, PPHA includes a community-based Action Team of local social services, behavioral health, and public health agencies and Cooperative Extension agents responsible for translating findings into quality improvement priorities. In Fall 2024, UKKD and UKCPH developed a statistical analysis plan to examine the interplay of social, geographic, and clinical factors associated with CRC screening rates, which is a UKKD quality improvement priority. Findings from this analysis of EHR and secondary county-level data and a summary of UKKD's existing quality improvement efforts related to CRC screening were presented to the Action Team in March 2025. The first meeting of the Action Team demonstrated initial proof-of-concept that PPHA approaches can catalyze community-based practice improvements. Immediately after the meeting with UKCPH support, the local health department and community mental health center pursued adoption of UKKD stool-based screening strategies and UKKD created a simple workflow for receiving referrals from community-based partners. This community case study contributes to community engagement with initial findings and best practices for PPHA of healthcare systems, local public health departments, and social services agencies to analyze population health trends in order to target quality improvement needs and co-design place-based, cross-sector strategies to address them with evidence-based practices. This replicable PPHA pilot in rural Kentucky and Ohio is an innovative method and model for how to engage communities most effectively in identifying and taking action to improve their chief health concerns.

Keywords: community health planning; community networks; community-based participatory research; electronic health records; precision public health; social determinants of health.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
The distribution of the various types of screening methods for colorectal cancer. This was presented to the Action Team in order to inform members about the various screening methods.
Figure 2
Figure 2
The proportion of UKKD patients screened for colorectal cancer. This was presented to the Action Team to show the distribution of patients screened within the service counties.

References

    1. Bradshaw TK. The post-place community: contributions to the debate about the definition of community. Community Dev. (2008) 39:5–16. doi: 10.1080/15575330809489738 - DOI
    1. Duea SR, Zimmerman EB, Vaughn LM, Dias S, Harris J. A guide to selecting participatory research methods based on project and partnership goals. J Particip Res Methods. (2022) 3:10.35844/001c.32605. doi: 10.35844/001c.32605, PMID: - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. McGladrey ML, Booty M, Olvera R, Balvanz P, Surratt HL, Matthews S, et al. Using photovoice to define “community” in substance use disorder research engaging service users, providers, and policymakers. SSM Qual Res Health. (2025) 7:100531. doi: 10.1016/j.ssmqr.2025.100531 - DOI
    1. Alderwick H, Gottlieb LM. Meanings and misunderstandings: a social determinants of health lexicon for health care systems. Milbank Q. (2019) 97:407–19. doi: 10.1111/1468-0009.12390, PMID: - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Islam MM. Social determinants of health and related inequalities: confusion and implications. Front Public Health. (2019);7. Available online at: https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/public-health/articles/10.3389/fpub... (Accessed April 20, 2025) - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources