Outcome of patients with accelerated and blast-phase myeloproliferative neoplasms not eligible for intensive chemotherapy or allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation treated by azacitidine alone or in combination-A FIM study
- PMID: 40918085
- PMCID: PMC12410146
- DOI: 10.1002/hem3.70202
Outcome of patients with accelerated and blast-phase myeloproliferative neoplasms not eligible for intensive chemotherapy or allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation treated by azacitidine alone or in combination-A FIM study
Abstract
Accelerated-phase (AP) or blast-phase (BP) myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPNs) are associated with dismal prognosis, with non-curative therapies such as hypomethylating agents (HMAs) considered in patients not eligible for intensive therapy, while some studies advocate for combination therapy with either ruxolitinib (RUXO) or venetoclax (VEN). To assess the relationship between treatment modalities and outcome, herein, we report a multicentric cohort of 149 patients (median age, 75 years) with AP/BP MPN not eligible for intensive therapy and/or allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation who received azacitidine (AZA) alone (n = 60) or in combination (n = 89; VEN [n = 51], RUXO [n = 27], or both [n = 9], isocitrate dehydrogenase inhibitors [n = 2]) between January 2019 and October 2023. With a median follow-up of 15 months, the median overall survival of the full cohort was 8.04 months, with a 3-year overall survival (OS) of 13%. Among disease characteristics, OS was lower in patients with BP (6.24 vs. 18.00 months in patients with AP disease, P = 0.03), complex karyotype (6.00 vs. 13.08 months, P = 0.005), and TP53 mutations (8.04 vs. 11.04 months, P = 0.009). OS was nonsignificantly higher in patients receiving AZA combinations (10.08 vs. 6.96 months in patients receiving AZA monotherapy, P = 0.12). When analyzing AZA combinations separately, patients who were treated with AZA-RUXO had higher OS (18.00 vs. 9.00 vs. 10.08 months in patients receiving AZA-VEN and AZA-VEN-RUXO, P = 0.015). The improved survival with AZA-RUXO in the absence of complex karyotype and/or TP53 mutations warrants further prospective validation. New therapeutic options are urgently needed, especially in patients with complex karyotype and/or TP53 mutations.
© 2025 The Author(s). HemaSphere published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of European Hematology Association.
Conflict of interest statement
Employment or leadership position: none; consultant or advisory role: none; stock ownership: none; honoraria: LB, Novartis, BMS, and GSK; research funding: LB, Gilead, and Pfizer; expert testimony: none; patents: none; other remuneration: none.
Figures
References
-
- Cahu X, Chevallier P, Clavert A, et al. Allo‐SCT for Philadelphia‐negative myeloproliferative neoplasms in blast phase: a study from the Societe Française de Greffe de Moelle et de Therapie Cellulaire (SFGM‐TC). Bone Marrow Transplant. 2014;49:756‐760. - PubMed
-
- Granfeldt Østgård LS, Medeiros BC, Sengeløv H, et al. Epidemiology and clinical significance of secondary and therapy‐related acute myeloid leukemia: a national population‐based cohort study. J Clin Oncol. 2015;33:3641‐3649. - PubMed
-
- Venton G, Courtier F, Charbonnier A, et al. Impact of gene mutations on treatment response and prognosis of acute myeloid leukemia secondary to myeloproliferative neoplasms. Am J Hematol. 2018;93:330‐338. - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Research Materials
Miscellaneous