Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Sep 4;9(9):e70202.
doi: 10.1002/hem3.70202. eCollection 2025 Sep.

Outcome of patients with accelerated and blast-phase myeloproliferative neoplasms not eligible for intensive chemotherapy or allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation treated by azacitidine alone or in combination-A FIM study

Affiliations

Outcome of patients with accelerated and blast-phase myeloproliferative neoplasms not eligible for intensive chemotherapy or allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation treated by azacitidine alone or in combination-A FIM study

Corentin Orvain et al. Hemasphere. .

Abstract

Accelerated-phase (AP) or blast-phase (BP) myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPNs) are associated with dismal prognosis, with non-curative therapies such as hypomethylating agents (HMAs) considered in patients not eligible for intensive therapy, while some studies advocate for combination therapy with either ruxolitinib (RUXO) or venetoclax (VEN). To assess the relationship between treatment modalities and outcome, herein, we report a multicentric cohort of 149 patients (median age, 75 years) with AP/BP MPN not eligible for intensive therapy and/or allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation who received azacitidine (AZA) alone (n = 60) or in combination (n = 89; VEN [n = 51], RUXO [n = 27], or both [n = 9], isocitrate dehydrogenase inhibitors [n = 2]) between January 2019 and October 2023. With a median follow-up of 15 months, the median overall survival of the full cohort was 8.04 months, with a 3-year overall survival (OS) of 13%. Among disease characteristics, OS was lower in patients with BP (6.24 vs. 18.00 months in patients with AP disease, P = 0.03), complex karyotype (6.00 vs. 13.08 months, P = 0.005), and TP53 mutations (8.04 vs. 11.04 months, P = 0.009). OS was nonsignificantly higher in patients receiving AZA combinations (10.08 vs. 6.96 months in patients receiving AZA monotherapy, P = 0.12). When analyzing AZA combinations separately, patients who were treated with AZA-RUXO had higher OS (18.00 vs. 9.00 vs. 10.08 months in patients receiving AZA-VEN and AZA-VEN-RUXO, P = 0.015). The improved survival with AZA-RUXO in the absence of complex karyotype and/or TP53 mutations warrants further prospective validation. New therapeutic options are urgently needed, especially in patients with complex karyotype and/or TP53 mutations.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Employment or leadership position: none; consultant or advisory role: none; stock ownership: none; honoraria: LB, Novartis, BMS, and GSK; research funding: LB, Gilead, and Pfizer; expert testimony: none; patents: none; other remuneration: none.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
(A) Overall survival for the whole cohort and stratified by (B) accelerated versus blast phase, (C) complex karyotype status, and (D) TP53 mutational status. AP, accelerated phase; BP, blast phase; CK, complex karyotype; mut, mutated; wt, wild type.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Overall survival for the whole cohort, stratified by (A) AZA monotherapy versus AZA combination therapy and (B) AZA monotherapy versus AZA–VEN versus AZA–RUXO versus AZA–VEN–RUXO. AZA, azacitidine; RUXO, ruxolitinib; VEN, venetoclax.

References

    1. Cahu X, Chevallier P, Clavert A, et al. Allo‐SCT for Philadelphia‐negative myeloproliferative neoplasms in blast phase: a study from the Societe Française de Greffe de Moelle et de Therapie Cellulaire (SFGM‐TC). Bone Marrow Transplant. 2014;49:756‐760. - PubMed
    1. Granfeldt Østgård LS, Medeiros BC, Sengeløv H, et al. Epidemiology and clinical significance of secondary and therapy‐related acute myeloid leukemia: a national population‐based cohort study. J Clin Oncol. 2015;33:3641‐3649. - PubMed
    1. McNamara CJ, Panzarella T, Kennedy JA, et al. The mutational landscape of accelerated‐ and blast‐phase myeloproliferative neoplasms impacts patient outcomes. Blood Adv. 2018;2:2658‐2671. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Tefferi A, Mudireddy M, Mannelli F, et al. Blast phase myeloproliferative neoplasm: Mayo‐AGIMM study of 410 patients from two separate cohorts. Leukemia. 2018;32:1200‐1210. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Venton G, Courtier F, Charbonnier A, et al. Impact of gene mutations on treatment response and prognosis of acute myeloid leukemia secondary to myeloproliferative neoplasms. Am J Hematol. 2018;93:330‐338. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources