Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Sep 4:17:143568.
doi: 10.52965/001c.143568. eCollection 2025.

Conservative treatment of achilles tendon rupture: a systematic review comparative with surgical treatment

Leonardo Santana Sr  1 , Rafael Rodrigues Sr  1 , Nilton Junior Sr  1 , João Cruz Sr  2
Affiliations

Conservative treatment of achilles tendon rupture: a systematic review comparative with surgical treatment

Leonardo Santana Sr et al. Orthop Rev (Pavia). .

Abstract

Background: Achilles tendon ruptures are common, particularly in active individuals, and significantly affect function. Controversy persists over whether conservative or surgical treatment offers superior outcomes.

Objective: To compare conservative and surgical treatments for Achilles tendon rupture regarding rerupture rates, functional recovery, and complication incidence.

Methods: A systematic review was conducted following PRISMA guidelines. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing conservative and surgical treatments published between 2015 and 2025 were selected using MEDLINE. Risk of bias was assessed using Cochrane RoB 2.0.

Results: Eight RCTs were included. Conservative treatment showed a higher rerupture rate but fewer complications. Surgical treatment, while reducing rerupture, increased risks of nerve injuries and infections. Long-term functional outcomes were generally comparable between groups.

Conclusion: Neither approach proved universally superior. Surgical repair may be preferred to prevent rerupture, but conservative treatment avoids operative complications. Clinical decisions should consider individual factors such as age, activity level, and patient preferences.

Keywords: Achilles tendon; conservative treatment; rerupture; surgical repair; systematic review.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.. Screening and selection of studies according to PRISMA methodology.
Source: Own authorship (2025).
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Epidemiology and Video Analysis of Achilles Tendon Ruptures. Lemme N. J.., et al. 2019Am J Sports Med. 47:2360–2366. doi: 10.1177/0363546519858609. https://doi.org/10.1177/0363546519858609 - DOI - DOI - PubMed
    1. The incidence of Achilles tendon ruptures in Edmonton, Canada. Suchak A. A.., et al. 2005Foot Ankle Int. 26:932–936. doi: 10.1177/107110070502601106. https://doi.org/10.1177/107110070502601106 - DOI - DOI - PubMed
    1. Increasing incidence of acute Achilles tendon rupture. Ganestam A. A.., et al. 2016Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 24:3730–3737. doi: 10.1007/s00167-015-3544-5. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-015-3544-5 - DOI - DOI - PubMed
    1. Rutura do Tendão de Aquiles: do Diagnóstico à Retoma Desportiva. Fabião L.., et al. 2023Rev Med Desportiva. 14(9):8–11. doi: 10.23911/rutura_Aquiles_2023_mar. https://doi.org/10.23911/rutura_Aquiles_2023_mar - DOI - DOI
    1. MRI is unnecessary for diagnosing acute Achilles tendon ruptures. Garras D. N.., et al. 2012Clin Orthop Relat Res. 470:2268–2273. doi: 10.1007/s11999-012-2355-y. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11999-012-2355-y - DOI - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources