Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Sep 8.
doi: 10.1007/s10899-025-10425-8. Online ahead of print.

Online Information on Gambling Addiction: Is It Readable? Is It Reliable?

Affiliations

Online Information on Gambling Addiction: Is It Readable? Is It Reliable?

Yunus Manastır et al. J Gambl Stud. .

Abstract

The aim of this study is to evaluate the readability and reliability of websites providing information about gambling. The study assessed 65 Turkish-language websites from Google. In this study, readability was assessed using the Ateşman Readability Index, which determines textual difficulty based on sentence and word length. Additionally, the reliability of the content was evaluated using the Journal of the American Medical Association benchmark, which assesses the trustworthiness of online information through four key criteria: authorship, attribution, disclosure, and currency. Journal of the American Medical Association score was 1.23 ± 0.93, and 64.6% of websites were rated as having "insufficient information/low reliability. The average Ateşman score was 51.63 ± 12.51, corresponding to an 11th-12th grade reading level, which is considered moderately difficult for general population. Despite 81.5% of the sites originating from health organizations, both readability and reliability were found to be inadequate. These findings highlight the need for more accessible and trustworthy digital resources on gambling addiction. Collaboration among content creators, health professionals, and policymakers is recommended to improve the readability and reliability of online health information.

Keywords: Gambling addiction; Internet; Online health information; Readability; Reliability.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declarations. Ethical Approval: This study did not involve any research with human or animal participants; therefore, informed consent was not required. Additionally, ethical approval was not obtained, as the study relied on secondary data that are publicly accessible. Informed Consent: Not applicable. Conflict of interest: The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Similar articles

References

    1. Abdulai, A. F., Howard, A. F., Parmar, G., Noga, H., Abdul-Ghafoor, A. A., Lisonek, M., & Yong, P. J. (2024). The quality, suitability, and readability of web-based resources on endometriosis-associated dyspareunia: A systematic review. Health Informatics Journal, 30(1), 14604582241231151. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Arlington, V., & Association, A. P. (2013). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders. American Psychiatric Association, 5, 612–613.
    1. Ateşman, E. (1997). Measuring readability in Turkish. AU Tömer Language Journal, 58(2), 171–174.
    1. Barclay, P. A., & Bowers, C. A. (2017). Design for the illiterate: a scoping review of tools for improving the health literacy of electronic health resources. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting.
    1. Bezirci, B., & Yılmaz, A. E. (2010). A software library for measurement of readability of texts and a new readability metric for Turkish. DEÜ FMD, 12(3), 49–62.

LinkOut - more resources