Online Information on Gambling Addiction: Is It Readable? Is It Reliable?
- PMID: 40920299
- DOI: 10.1007/s10899-025-10425-8
Online Information on Gambling Addiction: Is It Readable? Is It Reliable?
Abstract
The aim of this study is to evaluate the readability and reliability of websites providing information about gambling. The study assessed 65 Turkish-language websites from Google. In this study, readability was assessed using the Ateşman Readability Index, which determines textual difficulty based on sentence and word length. Additionally, the reliability of the content was evaluated using the Journal of the American Medical Association benchmark, which assesses the trustworthiness of online information through four key criteria: authorship, attribution, disclosure, and currency. Journal of the American Medical Association score was 1.23 ± 0.93, and 64.6% of websites were rated as having "insufficient information/low reliability. The average Ateşman score was 51.63 ± 12.51, corresponding to an 11th-12th grade reading level, which is considered moderately difficult for general population. Despite 81.5% of the sites originating from health organizations, both readability and reliability were found to be inadequate. These findings highlight the need for more accessible and trustworthy digital resources on gambling addiction. Collaboration among content creators, health professionals, and policymakers is recommended to improve the readability and reliability of online health information.
Keywords: Gambling addiction; Internet; Online health information; Readability; Reliability.
© 2025. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.
Conflict of interest statement
Declarations. Ethical Approval: This study did not involve any research with human or animal participants; therefore, informed consent was not required. Additionally, ethical approval was not obtained, as the study relied on secondary data that are publicly accessible. Informed Consent: Not applicable. Conflict of interest: The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
References
-
- Abdulai, A. F., Howard, A. F., Parmar, G., Noga, H., Abdul-Ghafoor, A. A., Lisonek, M., & Yong, P. J. (2024). The quality, suitability, and readability of web-based resources on endometriosis-associated dyspareunia: A systematic review. Health Informatics Journal, 30(1), 14604582241231151. - DOI - PubMed
-
- Arlington, V., & Association, A. P. (2013). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders. American Psychiatric Association, 5, 612–613.
-
- Ateşman, E. (1997). Measuring readability in Turkish. AU Tömer Language Journal, 58(2), 171–174.
-
- Barclay, P. A., & Bowers, C. A. (2017). Design for the illiterate: a scoping review of tools for improving the health literacy of electronic health resources. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting.
-
- Bezirci, B., & Yılmaz, A. E. (2010). A software library for measurement of readability of texts and a new readability metric for Turkish. DEÜ FMD, 12(3), 49–62.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
