Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Nov:212:111125.
doi: 10.1016/j.radonc.2025.111125. Epub 2025 Sep 6.

Dose, dose rate and split dose impacts murine skin responses following photon FLASH irradiation

Affiliations
Free article

Dose, dose rate and split dose impacts murine skin responses following photon FLASH irradiation

Kathryn H Brown et al. Radiother Oncol. 2025 Nov.
Free article

Abstract

Introduction: Preclinical evidence has demonstrated the potential of FLASH radiotherapy (FLASH-RT) to spare normal tissues compared to conventional (CONV) exposures. Most FLASH studies have used ultra-high dose rate (>40 Gy/sec) electrons and protons whilst comparatively few studies have reported photon FLASH responses. Given the widespread use of photons clinically, there is a need to characterise the FLASH effect using photons. In this study, we applied a novel photon FLASH system (FLASH-SARRP, Xstrahl) to investigate the effects of dose, dose rate and split dose on murine skin toxicity.

Methods: Skin toxicity was assessed at CONV (3.2 Gy/min) and FLASH (72 Gy/s) dose rates using the SARRP or FLASH-SARRP. CONV responses were investigated at a dose of 20.2 Gy and FLASH responses at doses of 18.1, 21.3 & 25.8 Gy. Comparative studies were conducted using a split dose exposure with an average dose rate of 2.8 Gy/s. Skin toxicity on the hind leg of C57BL/6 mice was visually scored and histopathological analysis performed at 8-12 weeks. Tumour growth delay was also assessed using a melanoma (B16-F10) xenograft model irradiated at FLASH and CONV dose rates.

Results: Skin toxicity was delayed for FLASH exposures and tissue analysis showed hyperplasia and significant fibrosis deposition (p < 0.01) in CONV mice compared to FLASH. Tissue recovery was observed for both dose rates from 8 weeks post RT. A dose dependent relationship for FLASH sparing was observed, while a split dose exposure resulted in loss of sparing. FLASH was equally effective for tumour control in comparison to CONV exposures (p = 0.99).

Conclusions: These results demonstrate it is feasible to deliver photon FLASH exposures with sparing consistent with observations from previous studies using proton and electron beams. Dose, average dose rate and beam structure are key parameters that modulate radiobiological responses to photon FLASH.

Keywords: FLASH; Photon; Preclinical; Skin; Toxicity.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declaration of competing interest The authors declare the following financial interests/personal relationships which may be considered as potential competing interests: J. Wong & M. Rezaee receive royalties from Xstrahl Inc, for JHU’s Intellectual Property regarding the FLASH-SARRP system. All remaining authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

LinkOut - more resources