Sevoflurane or remimazolam anaesthesia and emergence agitation after nasal surgery in adults: A randomised clinical trial
- PMID: 40923199
- DOI: 10.1097/EJA.0000000000002267
Sevoflurane or remimazolam anaesthesia and emergence agitation after nasal surgery in adults: A randomised clinical trial
Abstract
Background: Emergence agitation is common after nasal surgery under general anaesthesia. Remimazolam, a novel ultra-short-acting benzodiazepine, allows haemodynamic stability and prompt postoperative recovery, but the specific impact of remimazolam on emergence agitation is not well understood.
Objectives: The primary aim of this study was to compare the effects of remimazolam-based total intravenous anaesthesia (TIVA) and sevoflurane-based volatile induction and maintenance of anaesthesia (VIMA) on the occurrence of emergence agitation.
Design: A prospective, randomised, assessor-blinded clinical trial.
Setting: A single-centre study in a university-affiliated tertiary hospital.
Participants: Ninety-eight adults undergoing nasal surgery under general anaesthesia.
Interventions: Patients were randomised into two groups. The Sevoflurane group ( n = 49) received VIMA with sevoflurane and nitrous oxide, while the Remimazolam group ( n = 49) received TIVA with remimazolam and remifentanil.
Main outcome measures: The primary outcome was the occurrence of emergence agitation, which was evaluated using the Richmond Agitation-Sedation Scale and the Riker Sedation-Agitation Scale. The secondary outcomes were immediate complications after extubation and postoperative pain, and the interval between discontinuation of anaesthesia and extubation.
Results: Emergence agitation, as measured by the Richmond Agitation-Sedation Scale, occurred in six of 49 patients (12.2%) in the Sevoflurane group and none (0.0%) in the Remimazolam group. The risk difference was 12.2 (95% CI, 3.0 to 21.4, P = 0.008). The occurrence measured by the Riker Sedation-Agitation Scale was identical to that with the Richmond Agitation-Sedation Scale. Coughing was more frequent in the Sevoflurane group, 53.1 vs. 12.2%, risk difference = 40.8 (95% CI, 24.0 to 57.5, P < 0.001). In addition, the interval between discontinuation of anaesthesia and extubation was lower in the Remimazolam group than the Sevoflurane group (9.00 ± 4.25 min vs. 12.18 ± 4.18 min, respectively, P < 0.001).
Conclusion: The occurrence of emergence agitation in adult patients after nasal surgery under general anaesthesia can be significantly reduced using remimazolam-based TIVA.
Trial registration: Clinical Research Information Service (KCT0007387).
Copyright © 2025 European Society of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care. Unauthorized reproduction of this article is prohibited.
References
-
- Lee S-J, Sung T-Y. Emergence agitation: current knowledge and unresolved questions. Korean J Anesthesiol 2020; 73:471–485.
-
- Jo J-Y, Jung K-W, Kim H-J, et al. Effect of total intravenous anesthesia vs volatile induction with maintenance anesthesia on emergence agitation after nasal surgery: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2019; 145:117–123.
-
- Lepousé C, Lautner CA, Liu L, et al. Emergence delirium in adults in the postanaesthesia care unit. Br J Anaesth 2006; 96:747–753.
-
- Kim JH. Mechanism of emergence agitation induced by sevoflurane anesthesia. Korean J Anesthesiol 2011; 60:73–74.
-
- Sneyd JR, Rigby-Jones AE. Remimazolam for anaesthesia or sedation. Curr Opin Anesthesiol 2020; 33:506–511.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
