Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Nov;133(10):1544-1553.
doi: 10.1038/s41416-025-03180-5. Epub 2025 Sep 9.

The impact of cancer expectations on psychological responses following a cancer signal detected result in asymptomatic multi-cancer detection (MCED) testing

Affiliations

The impact of cancer expectations on psychological responses following a cancer signal detected result in asymptomatic multi-cancer detection (MCED) testing

Laura A V Marlow et al. Br J Cancer. 2025 Nov.

Abstract

Background: Multi-cancer detection (MCED) blood tests have the potential to screen for early-stage cancers. Understanding how people experience an MCED cancer signal result is vital prior to any future implementation. We explored experiences in a trial context.

Methods: A subset of 41 participants in the NHS-Galleri trial (NCT05611632), with a cancer signal detected result, were interviewed. We selected: 20 participants with cancer found (self-reported) and 21 without cancer (following tests). Transcripts were analysed thematically.

Results: Expectations of cancer played a pivotal role in emotional, cognitive and social responses, and were influenced by participants' experiences of health and symptoms. While the cancer signal was often unexpected, the predicted cancer signal origin made sense when consistent with family history or health issues. During the period of diagnostic uncertainty, views of healthiness or lack of family history were sometimes used to self-reassure. For some, a cancer diagnosis was unexpected; for others, expectations of cancer had gradually increased. For those without cancer, believing that it could be present affected their sense of reassurance.

Discussion: Information about the meaning of a cancer signal will be needed if MCED screening is implemented. Patient support could be designed around their expectations of cancer at each stage.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: JW reports research income from GRAIL Bio UK, Ltd., which funded 20% of her salary (2021–2024) and the full salaries of LAVM (2021–2025) and NSB (2021–2023) through a contract with King’s College London/Queen Mary University of London. Ethics approval and consent to participate: Ethics approval was granted by the Wales Research Ethics Committee as part of the NHS-Galleri trial (Ref 21/WA/0141). Full consent for the interview was collected prior to participation. This study was performed in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki.

References

    1. Etzioni R, Gulati R, Weiss NS. Multicancer early detection: learning from the past to meet the future. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2022;114:349–52. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Rubinstein WS, Patriotis C, Dickherber A, Han PKJ, Katki HA, LeeVan E, et al. Cancer screening with multicancer detection tests: A translational science review. CA Cancer J Clin. 2024;74:368–82. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Marlow LAV, Schmeising-Barnes N, Brain K, Duncombe S, Robb KA, Round T, et al. Multi-cancer early detection tests for cancer screening: a behavioural science perspective. Lancet Oncol. 2022;23:837–9. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Posner T, Vessey M. Psychosexual trauma of an abnormal cervical smear. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1988;95:729. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Salz T, Richman AR, Brewer NT. Meta-analyses of the effect of false-positive mammograms on generic and specific psychosocial outcomes. Psychooncology. 2010;19:1026–34. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources