Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Sep 9;17(1):148.
doi: 10.1186/s13148-025-01968-z.

Work-related stress and burnout: Is epigenetic aging the missing link?

Julian Eder  1 , Friederike Sophie David  2   3 , Sabrina Illius  4   5 , Nicole Rothe  6 , Magdalena Katharina Wekenborg  7 , Andreas Walther  8 , Marlene Penz  9 , Juulia Jylhävä  10   11 , Robert Miller  6   12 , Clemens Kirschbaum  6 , Nina Alexander  13   14
Affiliations

Work-related stress and burnout: Is epigenetic aging the missing link?

Julian Eder et al. Clin Epigenetics. .

Abstract

Background: Work-related stress is a well-established contributor to mental health decline, particularly in the context of burnout, a state of prolonged exhaustion. Epigenetic clocks, which estimate biological age based on DNA methylation (DNAm) patterns, have been proposed as potential biomarkers of chronic stress and its impact on biological aging and health. However, their role in mediating the relationship between work-related stress, physiological stress markers, and burnout remains unclear.

Methods: Here, we analyzed DNAm data from 296 employed individuals (nfemale = 202; Mage = 45.4; SDage = 11.3; rangeage = 19.5-67.1) from the longitudinally assessed cohort of the Dresden Burnout Study to investigate whether epigenetic aging mediates the relationship between work-related stress (effort-reward imbalance), hair glucocorticoids (cortisol, cortisone), and burnout symptoms. We examined four epigenetic clocks (DNAm Skin&Blood Age, DNAm PhenoAge, DNAm GrimAge, and DNAm GrimAge2) at baseline and follow-up (one year later). Additional mediation analyses were conducted for depressive symptoms to distinguish their potential effects from those specifically associated with burnout symptoms.

Results: As expected, work-related stress at baseline significantly predicted burnout (β = .47, p < .001) and depressive symptoms (β = .32, p < .001) at follow-up. However, epigenetic aging did not mediate these relationships, neither cross-sectionally (indirect effects of epigenetic age acceleration [EAA]: ßburnout = [-.0008, -.00001]) nor longitudinally (indirect effects of changes in raw clock estimates: ßburnout = [-.002, .007]). Furthermore, work-related stress and hair glucocorticoids were not significantly associated with any epigenetic age markers (all p values > .117), and both EAA and changes in epigenetic aging over time were unrelated to burnout or depressive symptoms (all p values > .190). Sensitivity analyses adjusting for blood cell composition and technical variance confirmed these findings.

Conclusions: Consequently, our results do not support the hypothesis that epigenetic aging serves as a biological mechanism linking work-related stress or biological stress markers to burnout symptoms. While work-related stress significantly predicts burnout and depressive symptoms, its association does not appear to be driven by epigenetic aging pathways in a low to moderately burdened population. These findings underscore the need for longer follow-up studies to explore alternative biological and psychosocial pathways that shape the long-term consequences of work-related stress on mental health.

Keywords: Burnout; DNA methylation; Depression; Epigenetic clock; Glucocorticoids; Longitudinal; Work-related stress.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declarations. Ethics approval and consent to participate: The authors declare that they have no competing interests. Competing interests: All studies were reviewed by the TUD Dresden University of Technology ethics committee with no objection (EK236062014) and conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki. All participants gave written informed consent.

References

    1. Leka S, Jain A, Organization WH. Health impact of psychosocial hazards at work: an overview. World Health Organization; 2010.
    1. Martinez MF, O’Shea KJ, Kern MC, Chin KL, Dinh JV, Bartsch SM, et al. The health and economic burden of employee burnout to US employers. Am J Prevent Med. 2025;68:645–55. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Nagarajan R, Ramachandran P, Dilipkumar R, Kaur P. Global estimate of burnout among the public health workforce: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Hum Resour Health. 2024;22:30. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Siegrist J. Adverse health effects of high-effort/low-reward conditions. J Occup Health Psychol. 1996;1:27–41. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Maslach C, Schaufeli WB, Leiter MP. Job burnout. Annu Rev Psychol. 2001;52:397–422. - DOI - PubMed