Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2025 Sep;37(9):e70135.
doi: 10.1002/ajhb.70135.

Women's Health: Contributions From Human Biology

Affiliations
Review

Women's Health: Contributions From Human Biology

Lynnette Leidy Sievert. Am J Hum Biol. 2025 Sep.

Abstract

The purpose of this review was to examine how human biologists have contributed to the field of women's health over the past 50 years. Prompted by the increasing international interest in gender equality during the 1970s and the beginning of the Human Biology Council in 1974, studies published in Human Biology (1974-1979) were reviewed for topical content. Based on the increasing national attention to the study of women's health and the inclusion of women in research during the 1990s, as well as the start of the American Journal of Human Biology in 1989, a topical review was carried out for articles published in the AJHB (1989-1995). Current topics in women's health, targeting the past decade, were organized in relation to biocultural perspectives, evolutionary approaches (life history and evolutionary medicine), and the Developmental Origins of Health and Disease. Central questions include whether the contributions of human biologists reflect changing levels of political interest in women's health across time, which topics remained the same across the 50 years, and which topics were added. Topics that held steady across time include pregnancy and lactation, bone mineral density, and blood pressure. Among the changes over time, girls and women were more likely to be included in research, studies of pregnancy were more likely to include maternal health, studies of nutrition became more common, and human biologists expanded their repertoire of explicit theoretical perspectives. Finally, this review ends with worries about the future.

Keywords: DOHaD; biocultural; evolutionary medicine; life history theory; menopause; women's health.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Adair, L. S. 1992. “Postpartum Nutritional Status of Filipino Women.” American Journal of Human Biology 4, no. 5: 635–646. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajhb.1310040510.
    1. Austin, D. M., and J. Ghesquiere. 1976. “Heat Tolerance of Bantu and Pygmoid Groups of the Zaire River Basin.” Human Biology 48, no. 3: 439–453.
    1. Austin, D. M., J. Ghesquiere, and M. Azama. 1979. “Work Capacity and Body Morphology of Bantu and Pygmoid Groups of Western Zaire.” Human Biology 51, no. 1: 79–89.
    1. Avis, N. E., P. A. Kaufert, M. Lock, S. M. McKinlay, and K. Vass. 1993. “The Evolution of Menopausal Symptoms.” Baillière's Clinical Endocrinology and Metabolism 7: 17–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0950‐351x(05)80268‐x.
    1. Beall, C. M., and M. C. Goldstein. 1992. “High Prevalence of Excess Fat and Central Fat Patterning Among Mongolian Pastoral Nomads.” American Journal of Human Biology 4, no. 6: 747–756. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajhb.1310040606.