Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 1985;45(6):333-42.

[Rationalization of the quantitative determination of fecal fat]

[Article in German]
  • PMID: 4092655
Comparative Study

[Rationalization of the quantitative determination of fecal fat]

[Article in German]
W Bornschein et al. Dtsch Z Verdau Stoffwechselkr. 1985.

Abstract

The stool wet weight/24 h correlated well with chemical fecal fat/24 h (n = 45, p less than 0.0001). The best and simpliest methods for stool homogenization were treatment of stool with starmix or stool dilution with water and shaking for 5 min. The coefficient of variance of one of this methods was as good as by the combined method. The coefficient of variance of fecal fat was significantly lower in homogenized stool specimens than in unprepared stool samples (p less than 0.01), but fat estimation in samples of not homogenized stool (n = 10) of normal persons also showed a significant difference in comparison with samples of stool (n = 15) from patients with malassimilation (p less than 0.01). The titrimetric method for estimation of fecal fat/24 h (van de Kamer) correlated very well with a simple convenient colorimetric method (Tomaszewski) (n = 52, r = 0.979, p = 0.001). There was no significant difference in fat excretion/24 h in two groups of patients with (n = 26) and without fat balance (n = 42).

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

LinkOut - more resources