VNS treatment in super-refractory status epilepticus: report of two cases and systematic review of literature
- PMID: 40928623
- DOI: 10.1007/s10072-025-08446-7
VNS treatment in super-refractory status epilepticus: report of two cases and systematic review of literature
Abstract
Background: super-refractory status epilepticus (SRSE) is a rare and severe neurological condition associated with high mortality and significant long-term morbidity. In many cases, conventional medical treatments prove ineffective, with wide use of off-label therapies.
Methods: two researchers conducted a review of the medical records of subjects who had undergone VNS implantation in our tertiary Centre. Additionally, we performed a comprehensive search of the PubMed/MEDLINE and Embase databases. Only manuscripts published in English were included in the review.
Results: seventeen studies, encompassing 64 subjects (including the two patients from our series), met the inclusion criteria. The mean age at the time of VNS implantation was 17.3 years, and 52% of subjects admitted for SRSE had a prior history of epilepsy. The mean number of anti-seizure medications used before VNS implantation was 7, with a median duration of the status of 26 days prior to VNS. VNS led to the resolution of SRSE in 84% of subjects (93% of those with convulsive SRSE and 83% with non-convulsive SRSE). In terms of parameters applied, we found the following median values: Amperage: 1.75 mA; frequency: 30 Hz; Pulse Width: 500 uSec; Duty cycle: 16%; Time On: 30 sec and Time Off: 5 min.
Conclusion: VNS can be an effective treatment option in individuals with SRSE unresponsive to medical treatment.
Keywords: Anti-Seizure-Medication; Super-refractory Status-Epilepticus (SRSE); Vagal nerve stimulation (VNS).
© 2025. Fondazione Società Italiana di Neurologia.
Conflict of interest statement
Declarations. Ethical approval: none, this is a systematic review of previous published cases and it was conducted according to the 1964 Declaration of Helsinki. Informed consent: we have acquired the informed consent of cases described. Conflict of interest: this study was partly conducted in the framework of the ERN EpiCARE. The authors declare no conflict of interests.
References
-
- Trinka E, Cock H, Hesdorffer D et al (2015) A definition and classification of status epilepticus – Report of the ILAE task force on classification of status epilepticus. Epilepsia 56:1515–1523. https://doi.org/10.1111/epi.13121
-
- Shorvon S, Ferlisi M (2011) The treatment of super–refractory status epilepticus: a critical review of available therapies and a clinical treatment protocol. Brain 134:2802–2818. https://doi.org/10.1093/brain/awr215 . .
-
- Delaj L, Novy J, Ryvlin P et al (2017) Refractory and super−refractory status epilepticus in adults: a 9−year cohort study. Acta Neurol Scand 135:92–99. https://doi.org/10.1111/ane.12605
-
- Kantanen AM, Reinikainen M, Parviainen I, Kälviäinen R (2017) Long−term outcome of refractory status epilepticus in adults: A retrospective population−based study. Epilepsy Research 133:13–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eplepsyres.2017.03.009
-
- Cornwall CD, Krøigård T, Kristensen JSS et al (2023) Outcomes and treatment approaches for super−refractory status epilepticus: A Systematic Review and Meta−Analysis. JAMA Neurol 80:959–968. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamaneurol.2023.2407
Publication types
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Miscellaneous