Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Meta-Analysis
. 2025 Sep 10;410(1):269.
doi: 10.1007/s00423-025-03778-6.

Is there a chance for curative treatment for metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma? A systematic review with meta-analysis

Affiliations
Meta-Analysis

Is there a chance for curative treatment for metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma? A systematic review with meta-analysis

Kellil Tarek et al. Langenbecks Arch Surg. .

Abstract

Introduction: Pancreatic adenocarcinomas (PDAC) have a poor prognosis, with a 5-year relative Survival rate of 11.5%. Only 20% of patients are initially eligible for resection, and 50% of patients presented with metastatic disease, currently only candidates' palliative treatment. This meta-analysis compares the outcomes of surgical treatment versus chemotherapy or palliative care for M-PDAC.

Methods: A literature search was performed on May, 9th of 2024. A meta-analysis was then conducted. The primary outcome was Overall Survival and the secondary outcomes were 1-year Survival and 3-year survival. Subgroup analysis was also performed, based on metastatic sites.

Results: The analyses showed a significant benefit of surgical treatment in terms of overall survival (HR: 0.42, 95% CI [0.33- 0.53]), 1-year survival (OR: 0.37, CI 95% [0.26, 0.52]), and 3-year survival (OR: 0.16, CI 95% [0.07, 0.383]). In the subgroup analysis based on metastatic site, the benefit of surgical treatment persisted for liver-only metastases (HR : 0.40, CI 95% [0.29, 0.53]), but not for lung-only metastases.

Conclusion: This meta-analysis showed a survival advantage for surgical treatment in patients with M-PDAC and especially in liver-only metastases. Prospective trials are needed to confirm these findings and refine patient selection criteria for surgical treatment.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declarations. Competing interests: The authors declare no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
PRISMA flow-chart of the bibliographic research
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Forest plot overall survival
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Overall survival: subgroup analysis based on metastatic site
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Forest Plot of 1-year survival
Fig. 5
Fig. 5
1-year survival: subgroup analysis based on metastatic site
Fig. 6
Fig. 6
Forest plot of 3-year survival
Fig. 7
Fig. 7
3-year survival: subgroup analysis based on metastatic site

References

    1. Bray F, Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I, Siegel RL, Torre LA, Jemal A (2018) Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin Nov 68(6):394–424 - PubMed
    1. WCRF International [Internet] [2024] Cancer Prevention Organisation | World Cancer Research Fund International. Disponible sur: https://www.wcrf.org/
    1. Bockhorn M, Uzunoglu FG, Adham M, Imrie C, Milicevic M, Sandberg AA et al (2014) Borderline resectable pancreatic cancer: A consensus statement by the international study group of pancreatic surgery (ISGPS). Surg 1 Juin 155(6):977–988 - PubMed
    1. Cancer Facts & Figs (2022) | American Cancer Society [Internet] [cité 1 juill 2024] Disponible sur: https://www.cancer.org/research/cancer-facts-statistics/all-cancer-facts...
    1. Schwarz C, Fitschek F, Primavesi F, Stättner S, Margonis GA, Weiss MA et al (2020) Metachronous hepatic resection for liver only pancreatic metastases. Surg Oncol 1 Déc 35:169–173 - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources