Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Sep 10.
doi: 10.1097/SCS.0000000000011918. Online ahead of print.

Endoscopic Spring Mediated Cranioplasty for Management of Coronal Craniosynostosis

Ruth Tevlin  1 , Robin T Wu  1 , Elizabeth Cox  1 , Charlotte Berry  2 , Robert Menard  1   3
Affiliations

Endoscopic Spring Mediated Cranioplasty for Management of Coronal Craniosynostosis

Ruth Tevlin et al. J Craniofac Surg. .

Abstract

Background: Spring-mediated cranioplasty (SMC) is a safe and effective treatment for craniosynostosis. The authors describe the largest cohort of endoscopic SMC for coronal craniosynostosis to date, highlighting the evolution of their technique.

Methods: The authors retrospectively reviewed patients who underwent endoscopic coronal suturectomy and SMC between 2017 and 2023. Patients were analyzed based on demographics, operative details, and outcomes. In brief, an incision was made over the midpoint of the affected coronal suture. Endoscopic suturectomy and SMC was performed.

Results: Seventeen patients underwent endoscopic suturectomy and spring placement, with a mean follow up of 25 months. Patients were diagnosed and underwent surgery at a mean age of 4 months. Mean intraoperative blood loss was 35 mL (range: 10-100 mL) and mean intraoperative blood transfusion volume was 45 mL (range: 0-120 mL). The median spring force was 9N (range: 6-9.5N). The average length of stay was 1 day (range: 1-3 d). Springs allowed 35 mm (median: 28-44 mm range) expansion at the time of the final skull radiograph and were removed at a mean of 4 months postoperatively. To date, no patient has undergone open revision. No intraoperative complications occurred. Six postoperative complications occurred, including superficial surgical site infection managed with oral antibiotics (n=1), an exposed spring (n=1) requiring local wound care, a dislodged spring requiring a return to the operating room (n=3), and suture refusion requiring repeat suturectomy (n=1).

Conclusions: Here, the authors report the largest experience of endoscopic SMC for treatment of coronal craniosynostosis, highlighting the associated benefits and challenges of the technique. Future comparative studies will be helpful for direct comparisons.

Keywords: Craniosynostosis; endoscopic synostectomy; spring assisted; spring expansion; unicoronal synostosis; unilateral coronal craniosynostosis.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors report no conflicts of interest​​​​​​.

References

    1. Vastardis H, Mulliken JB, Glowacki J. Unilateral coronal synostosis: a histomorphometric study. Cleft Palate Craniofac J 2004;41:439–446
    1. Baweja K, Sun AH, Sawh-Martinez R, et al. Temporal progression of craniofacial dysmorphology in unilateral coronal synostosis: a mechanistic hypothesis. J Craniofac Surg. 2018;29:1174–1180
    1. Delahaye S, Bernard J, Rénier D, et al. Prenatal ultrasound diagnosis of fetal craniosynostosis. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol Off J Int Soc Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2003;21:347–353
    1. Stelnicki EJ, Mooney MP, Losken HW, et al. Ultrasonic prenatal diagnosis of coronal suture synostosis. J Craniofac Surg. 1997;8:252–258
    1. Pfaff MJ, Wong K, Persing JA, et al. Zygomatic dysmorphology in unicoronal synostosis. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2013;66:1096–1102

LinkOut - more resources