Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Sep 11:JCO2501608.
doi: 10.1200/JCO-25-01608. Online ahead of print.

End Points for the Next-Generation Bladder-Sparing Perioperative Trials for Patients With Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer

Affiliations

End Points for the Next-Generation Bladder-Sparing Perioperative Trials for Patients With Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer

Andrea Necchi et al. J Clin Oncol. .

Abstract

Purpose: The evolving treatment landscape of muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC) increasingly warrants novel trial design to evaluate perioperative strategies aimed at bladder preservation. To establish standardized outcome measures for evaluating organ preservation strategies in MIBC, the International Bladder Cancer Group (IBCG) and the Global Society of Rare Genitourinary Tumors (GSRGT) assembled an international, multidisciplinary consensus panel.

Methods: The IBCG and GSRGT gathered global bladder cancer experts and patient advocates to establish a framework for risk-adapted bladder-sparing treatment approaches for MIBC. Working groups reviewed the literature and developed draft recommendations, which were discussed at a live meeting in December 2024 in Milan. This was followed by voting by the members using a modified Delphi process. Recommendations achieving ≥75% agreement during the meeting were further refined and presented.

Results: Clinical complete response (cCR) definition should encompass the absence of high-grade malignancy on pathology and malignant cells on urine cytology and no evidence of local or metastatic disease on cross-sectional imaging. Although cCR remains immature as a primary or coprimary end point in registrational trials, it could serve as a suitable end point in early-phase studies and risk-adapted investigations. Event-free survival (EFS) remains the preferred primary end point as it could reliably capture the durability of clinically meaningful benefit after omittance of surgical consolidation or chemoradiation. Given the composite nature of EFS, events should be prespecified, evaluated in an intention-to-treat approach, and meticulously collected. Continuous assessment of individual patient preferences should begin at the outset of perioperative therapy discussions, with informed decision making prioritized throughout.

Conclusion: The consensus definition of cCR and the framework presented in this study can serve as a foundation for thorough testing of risk-adapted bladder-sparing treatment paradigms for MIBC.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Panelists, all of whom are co-authors of this manuscript, have individually declared all potential and actual financial relationships and competing interests relevant to the topics discussed as part of the development of this manuscript. Those with industry employment or significant financial interests that may impair unbiased contributions were recused from discussions and development of this consensus report. Guideline development procedures, including in-person and virtual attendance, were funded solely by IBCG and GSRGT. No for-profit or industry funding was involved.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
A simplified overview of standard-of-care treatment for surgically fit and systemic treatment eligible patients with muscle invasive bladder cancer and next generation bladder preservation strategies. Abbreviations: cCR: clinical response; ctDNA: circulating tumor DNA; EFS: event-free survival; MRI: magnetic resonance imaging; PROs: patient reported outcomes; TURBT: Transurethral resection of bladder tumor; utDNA: urinary tumor DNA. Created by Biorender.com *Currently being tested prospectively

References

    1. Flaig TW, Tangen CM, Daneshmand S, et al. A Randomized Phase II Study of Coexpression Extrapolation (COXEN) with Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy for Bladder Cancer (SWOG S1314; NCT02177695). Clin Cancer Res. 2021. May 1;27(9):2435–2441. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Pfister C, Gravis G, Flechin A, et al. Perioperative dose-dense methotrexate, vinblastine, doxorubicin, and cisplatin in muscle-invasive bladder cancer (VESPER): survival endpoints at 5 years in an open-label, randomised, phase 3 study. Lancet Oncol. 2024. Feb;25(2):255–264. - PubMed
    1. Necchi A, Anichini A, Raggi D, et al. Pembrolizumab as Neoadjuvant Therapy Before Radical Cystectomy in Patients With Muscle-Invasive Urothelial Bladder Carcinoma (PURE-01): An Open-Label, Single-Arm, Phase II Study. J Clin Oncol. 2018. Dec 1;36(34):3353–3360. - PubMed
    1. Powles T, Kockx M, Rodriguez-Vida A, et al. Clinical efficacy and biomarker analysis of neoadjuvant atezolizumab in operable urothelial carcinoma in the ABACUS trial. Nat Med. 2019. Nov;25(11):1706–1714. - PubMed
    1. van Dijk N, Gil-Jimenez A, Silina K, et al. Preoperative ipilimumab plus nivolumab in locoregionally advanced urothelial cancer: the NABUCCO trial. Nat Med. 2020. Dec;26(12):1839–1844. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources