Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Sep 9:S0195-6701(25)00267-1.
doi: 10.1016/j.jhin.2025.08.008. Online ahead of print.

Assessing Hospital Cleaning Effectiveness Using Fluorescence: A Proof-of-Concept Study and Comparison to ATP Testing

Affiliations
Free article

Assessing Hospital Cleaning Effectiveness Using Fluorescence: A Proof-of-Concept Study and Comparison to ATP Testing

Sarah Fieldhouse et al. J Hosp Infect. .
Free article

Abstract

Visual inspections are used to assess hospital cleanliness as visible contamination may present health risks and influence perceptions of care quality. Problematically, many contaminants are invisible to the naked eye, limiting the reliability of visual checks. Many invisible substances, however, fluoresce - emit visible light after absorbing electromagnetic radiation. Portable torches can detect fluorescent substances 'in situ', offering a potential method to enhance cleaning practices. This study has evaluated fluorescence as a tool for identifying general invisible contamination after hospital cleaning. Visibly clean surfaces in seven single-occupancy patient rooms and two six-bed wards across two NHS hospitals were examined using a portable high-intensity blue and UV light torch. Adenosine triphosphate levels in fluorescent and non-fluorescent areas were taken as a recognised cleaning monitoring tool and statistically analysed using Wilcoxon Signed-Rank tests. Fluorescent contamination that was invisible to the naked eye was found on every surface. ATP Relative Light Unit (RLU) levels were statistically different (higher) in fluorescent substances compared to non-fluorescent (p ≤ 0.05) with large effect sizes on patient chairs, bed frames, overbed tables, bedside units, and pillows, but not toilets, sinks, or commodes. The mean RLU measurement was 161 in fluorescent areas compared to 33 RLU in the control areas. Fluorescence detected alternative contamination which could present toxic risk to humans, possibly cleaning fluid and/or drug contaminated residue, which frequently contain fluorescent constituents. This was an important finding since relying solely on ATP detection may overlook significant contamination risks. Further work to evaluate the method as a cleaning aid is encouraged.

Keywords: ATP; Cleaning; Fluorescence; Patient safety; Visual inspection.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declaration of Competing Interest Dr Sarah Fieldhouse reports financial support was provided by Healthcare Infection Society for part of this study. All authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

LinkOut - more resources