Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 1985 Jan;1(1):17-29.
doi: 10.1007/BF02832685.

Evaluation of two prototype devices producing noninvasive, pulsatile, calibrated blood pressure measurement from a finger

Evaluation of two prototype devices producing noninvasive, pulsatile, calibrated blood pressure measurement from a finger

N T Smith et al. J Clin Monit. 1985 Jan.

Abstract

We evaluated two prototype instruments that measure pulsatile blood pressure continuously and noninvasively and compared the mean arterial pressure obtained from these devices with that obtained invasively in 17 male surgical patients. Each prototype consisted of an infrared photoplethysmograph mounted inside a finger cuff. The cuff was connected to a pressure control valve, which rapidly changed the cuff pressure so as to maintain a null pressure difference across the finger arterial wall. The resultant cuff pressure rapidly tracked the pulsatile intraarterial pressure. The prototypes reproduced absolute pressure, as well as pressure changes, accurately and linearly over a wide range of mean arterial pressures (from 2 to 164 mm Hg), with an average offset error of 0.8 mm Hg (SD +/- 3.8; range, -4.6 to 7.9), a mean scatter error of 5.3 mm Hg (range, 3.6 to 8.6), a mean regression slope of 0.97 (range, 0.79 to 1.22) and a mean correlation coefficient of the regression of 0.96 (range, 0.89 to 0.98). Both prototypes worked satisfactorily on all 17 patients, but not all the time on all patients. In 7 patients, probable arterial spasm prevented measurement of finger blood pressure 12.1% of the time, or 5.4% of the time for all patients. Ninety-six percent of the lost samples occurred with prototype 2, suggesting an instrument-related cause, rather than one related to the principle itself. The prototypes were simple to use and were almost free from artifact. Continuous monitoring for up to 7 hours on a single finger caused no harm to the finger.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Circulation. 1954 Oct;10(4):481-90 - PubMed
    1. Pediatrics. 1978 Sep;62(3):326-30 - PubMed
    1. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 1980 Mar;27(3):150-5 - PubMed
    1. Am J Physiol. 1979 Nov;237(5):H632-7 - PubMed
    1. Anesthesiology. 1985 May;62(5):557-61 - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources