Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Sep 1;15(17):1344.
doi: 10.3390/nano15171344.

Two-Dimensional Materials for Raman Thermometry on Power Electronic Devices

Affiliations

Two-Dimensional Materials for Raman Thermometry on Power Electronic Devices

Mohammed Boussekri et al. Nanomaterials (Basel). .

Abstract

Raman thermometry is a powerful technique for sub-microscale thermal measurements on semiconductor-based devices, provided that the active region remains accessible and is not obscured by metallization. Since pure metals do not exhibit Raman scattering, traditional Raman thermometry becomes ineffective in such cases. To overcome this limitation, we propose the use of atomically thin Two-Dimensional materials as local temperature sensors. These materials generate Raman spectra at the nanoscale, enabling highly precise absolute surface temperature measurements. In this study, we investigate the feasibility and effectiveness of this approach by applying it to power devices, including a calibrated gold resistor and an SiC Junction Barrier Schottky (JBS) diode. We assess the processing challenges and measurement reliability of 2D materials for thermal characterization. To validate our findings, we complement Raman thermometry with thermoreflectance measurements, which are well suited for metallized surfaces. For example, on the serpentine resistor, Raman thermometry applied to the 2D material yielded a thermal resistance of 22.099 °C/W, while thermoreflectance on the metallic surface measured 21.898 °C/W. This close agreement suggests good thermal conductance at the metal/2D material interface. The results demonstrate the potential of integrating 2D materials as effective nanoscale temperature probes, offering new insights into thermal management strategies for advanced electronic components. Additionally, thermal simulations are conducted to further analyze the thermal response of these devices under operational conditions. Furthermore, we investigate two 2D material integration methods, transfer and direct growth, and evaluate them through measured thermal resistances for the SiC JBS diode, highlighting the influence of the deposition technique on thermal performance.

Keywords: 2D materials; 3D finite elements simulations; Raman spectrometry; power electronics; thermal sensors; thermoreflectance.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Schematic of junction temperature measurement in GaN-based HEMT devices using Raman spectroscopy: (left) without 2D material, (right) with a 2D material layer deposited above the gate region.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Energy spectrum and atomic crystal structures for monolayers of different two-dimensional (2D) materials. From left to right: boron nitride (h-BN), transition metal dichalcogenides (TMDCs), black phosphorous, and graphene. Adapted from [11].
Figure 3
Figure 3
Experimental steps of the 2D material transfer (left) and the direct synthesis and growth on the target device (right).
Figure 4
Figure 4
PDMS stamp with a surface contact area of approximatively 700 × 900 µm2.
Figure 5
Figure 5
PtSe2 patch transferred on aluminum surface of an SiC diode (left) and Raman mapping of Eg peak intensity (right).
Figure 6
Figure 6
PtSe2 patches on an SiC diode using the “2D growth” method.
Figure 7
Figure 7
Raman signature during the PtSe2 patches manufacturing, using the transfer method (left) and the growth method (right).
Figure 8
Figure 8
Schematic of thermal and electric setup for Raman temperature measurements.
Figure 9
Figure 9
Optical view of the Raman measurements with electrical probes.
Figure 10
Figure 10
Schematic of the thermoreflectance setup.
Figure 11
Figure 11
Variation of the thermal coefficient of reflectance Cth as a function of wavelength for different materials.
Figure 12
Figure 12
SiC diode wafer under test in thermoreflectance setup.
Figure 13
Figure 13
Optical image of the die with 16 resistors. The resistor used is highlighted in yellow and wires are connected to electrical setup.
Figure 14
Figure 14
Optical images of the 32/64 resistor after the PtSe2 transfer by PDMS technique (left); zoom of the PtSe2 patch on the resistor with the laser spot for thermal Raman measurement (right).
Figure 15
Figure 15
Thermal calibration curve with the AS/S Raman peak intensity ratio method. 50X, 2400 lines/mm, Notch filter, static regular, 0.25 mW, 30 s, 4 frames.
Figure 16
Figure 16
Thermal calibration curve with the Raman peak shift method. 50X, 3000 lines/mm, edge filter, static regular, 0.25 mW, 30 s, 2 frames.
Figure 17
Figure 17
Thermoreflectance calibration image of the 32 × 64 resistor (left); thermoreflectance ΔT (°C) distribution of the 32 × 64 resistor for a dissipated power of 5.9 W (right).
Figure 18
Figure 18
Dimensions of the different layers for the geometry of the 32 × 64 resistor.
Figure 19
Figure 19
Steady state thermal simulation of the 32 × 64 resistor.
Figure 20
Figure 20
Temperature calibration (left); dissipated power measurements (right).
Figure 21
Figure 21
Infrared measurement on 32 × 64 resistor, emissivity of materials (left); temperature mapping for 5.7 W dissipated at Tcase = 50 °C (right).
Figure 22
Figure 22
Infrared measurement on 32 × 64 resistor with coating.
Figure 23
Figure 23
Temperature extraction with the Eg Raman peak shift, AS/S Eg peak intensity ratio, thermoreflectance, thermal simulation, electrical method, and infrared measurement on the 32 × 64 resistor at Tcase = 50 °C.
Figure 24
Figure 24
Temperature extraction with the A1g Raman peak shift, AS/S A1g peak intensity ratio, thermoreflectance, thermal simulation, electrical method, and infrared measurement on the 32 × 64 resistor at Tcase = 50 °C.
Figure 25
Figure 25
Optical image of an SiC diode (left); cross-sectional schematic of the SiC diode (right).
Figure 26
Figure 26
Optical image of the SiC JBS diode with grown 2D material using the thermoreflectance CCD camera.
Figure 27
Figure 27
Calibration Image of the SiC JBS diode using a wavelength of 780 nm.
Figure 28
Figure 28
Temperature vs. dissipated power for grown patch and aluminum metallization of the SiC JBS diode.
Figure 29
Figure 29
Optical image of an SiC JBS diode without 2D material.
Figure 30
Figure 30
Temperature vs. dissipated power of the SiC JBS diode without 2D material.
Figure 31
Figure 31
Thermal calibration curve with the Eg Raman peak shift method for grown PtSe2 patches on the SiC diode. 50XLF, 3000 lines/mm, edge filter, static regular, 0.25 mW, 30 s, 4 frames.
Figure 32
Figure 32
Temperature extraction with the Eg Raman peak shift (orange dots) for grown patch on SiC diode vs. thermoreflectance measurements (blue dots).
Figure 33
Figure 33
Thermal calibration curve with the Eg Raman peak shift method for transferred PtSe2 patches on the SiC diode. 50XLF, 3000 lines/mm, edge filter, static regular, 0.25 mW, 30 s, 4 frames.
Figure 34
Figure 34
Temperature extraction with the Eg Raman peak shift for transferred patch (blue dots) and etched patch (red dots) on power SiC diode, from 0 to 6 A at Tcase = 50 °C.
Figure 35
Figure 35
The Schottky-JBS diode mounted on the AlN support.
Figure 36
Figure 36
Temperature variation vs. power for thermal paste with k = 2.5 W/mK (left) and k = 0.5 W/mK (right).
Figure 37
Figure 37
X radiography of the die attach for the two samples; presence of important voids for the etch patch one (right).

References

    1. STMicroelectronics . STMicroelectronics Company Presentation. STMicroelectronics; Geneva, Switzerland: 2024.
    1. Baczkowski L., Jacquet J.-C., Jardel O., Gaquiere C., Moreau M., Carisetti D., Brunel L., Vouzelaud F., Mancuso Y. Thermal Characterization Using Optical Methods of AlGaN/GaN HEMTs on SiC Substrate in RF Operating Conditions. IEEE Trans. Electron Devices. 2015;62:3992–3998. doi: 10.1109/TED.2015.2493204. - DOI
    1. [(accessed on 18 August 2025)]. Available online: https://microsanj.com/products/thermoreflectance-imaging/sanjscope-nt220.
    1. Jakani A., Sommet R., Gaillard F., Nallatamby J.-C. Comparison of GaN HEMTs Thermal Results through different measurements methodologies: Validation with 3D simulation; Proceedings of the 27th International Workshop on Thermal Investigations of ICs and Systems; Berlin, Germany. 23 September 2021; - DOI
    1. Kuball M., Hayes J., Uren M., Martin I., Birbeck J., Balmer R., Hughes B. Measurement of temperature in active high-power AlGaN/GaN HFETs using Raman spectroscopy. IEEE Electron Device Lett. 2002;23:7–9. doi: 10.1109/55.974795. - DOI

Grants and funding

LinkOut - more resources