Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2025 Aug 22;17(17):2726.
doi: 10.3390/nu17172726.

Potential Effects of Low-Calorie Sweeteners on Human Health

Affiliations
Review

Potential Effects of Low-Calorie Sweeteners on Human Health

Huang-Pin Chen et al. Nutrients. .

Abstract

Low-calorie sweeteners (LCS) are widely utilized as sugar substitutes due to their intense sweetness, thermal stability, and applicability in weight management and diabetic-friendly products. However, increasing evidence has raised concerns about their potential long-term effects on metabolic health, glucose regulation, cardiovascular function, carcinogenicity, and gut microbiota composition. This review systematically evaluates the pharmacokinetics, metabolic effects, and associated health outcomes of major LCS. Mechanistically, LCS exert effects via sweet taste receptor-mediated pathways, altering glucose absorption, insulin secretion, and intracellular signaling cascades. Additionally, LCS influence gut microbiota composition, with certain agents promoting dysbiosis and glucose intolerance. While some findings support the metabolic benefits of selected LCS, others underscore potential risks, necessitating cautious interpretation. In conclusion, while LCS offer viable alternatives to sugar, their health effects are context-dependent and may vary across different sweeteners and populations. Long-term, high-quality clinical trials are essential to elucidate their safety and efficacy.

Keywords: artificial sweetener; aspartame; diabetes; obesity; sucralose.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Study searching.

References

    1. Evaluation of Certain Food Additives and Contaminants. Thirty-Seventh Report of the Joint FAO/WHO Expert Committee on Food Additives. World Health Organization; Geneva, Switzelrand: 1991. pp. 1–52. (World Health Organization Technical Report Series 806). - PubMed
    1. Grotz V.L., Munro I.C. An overview of the safety of sucralose. Regul. Toxicol. Pharmacol. 2009;55:1–5. doi: 10.1016/j.yrtph.2009.05.011. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Ruiz-Ojeda F.J., Plaza-Díaz J., Sáez-Lara M.J., Gil A. Effects of Sweeteners on the Gut Microbiota: A Review of Experimental Studies and Clinical Trials. Adv. Nutr. 2019;10((Suppl. S1)):S31–S48. doi: 10.1093/advances/nmy037. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Thomson P., Santibañez R., Aguirre C., Galgani J.E., Garrido D. Short-term impact of sucralose consumption on the metabolic response and gut microbiome of healthy adults. Br. J. Nutr. 2019;122:856–862. doi: 10.1017/S0007114519001570. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Wu H.T., Lin C.H., Pai H.L., Chen Y.C., Cheng K.P., Kuo H.Y., Li C.H., Ou H.Y. Sucralose, a Non-nutritive Artificial Sweetener Exacerbates High Fat Diet-Induced Hepatic Steatosis Through Taste Receptor Type 1 Member 3. Front. Nutr. 2022;9:823723. doi: 10.3389/fnut.2022.823723. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources