Study of Concordance and Discordance between Preoperative Magnetic Resonance Imaging Findings and Intraoperative Findings in Peripheral Nerve Pathologies
- PMID: 40946282
- DOI: 10.4103/neurol-india.Neurol-India-D-23-00499
Study of Concordance and Discordance between Preoperative Magnetic Resonance Imaging Findings and Intraoperative Findings in Peripheral Nerve Pathologies
Abstract
Background: It is important that the peripheral nerve (PN) pathologies are identified early as most patients are young, and delay in treatment can have lasting implications. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is routinely used in formulating an appropriate management plan.
Objectives: This study was aimed at assessing usefulness and efficacy of MRI in diagnosing PN pathologies by comparing the preoperative MRI findings with the intraoperative findings, thereby helping in prognostication and treatment planning.
Methods and material: It was a double-blind prospective, nonrandomized study of diagnostic efficacy that was conducted on 95 surgically treated patients with PN pathologies in the Department of Neurosurgery. The radiologist conducted a preoperative MRI evaluation, while one of the coauthors from the operating team had no access to the preoperative MRI scan findings. The senior operating neurosurgeon evaluated intraoperative findings, keeping the radiologist blind. The data were then compared to determine concordance and discordance between the two findings. Cohen's Kappa test was used for agreement. Diagnostic analysis was performed using Medcalc software (version 22). A P value less than 0.05 was considered significant.
Results: We found that the overall sensitivity of MRI for diagnosing PN problems was 97.52%, with a specificity of 91.95%, a positive predictive value of 89.39%, and a negative predictive value of 98.16%. The overall accuracy was found to be 94.24%, with Cohen's kappa value of 0.88, showing a strong level of agreement.
Conclusions: MRI is an effective tool that helps in accurately diagnosing a plethora of PN problems with significant intraoperative correlation, ultimately helping in patient care and management.
Keywords: Diagnostic efficacy; magnetic resonance imaging; peripheral nerve pathology.
Copyright © 2025 Neurology India, Neurological Society of India.
References
-
- Fox IK, MacKinnon SE. Adult peripheral nerve disorders: Nerve entrapment, repair, transfer, and brachial plexus disorders. Plast Reconstr Surg 2011;127:105e-18e.
-
- Fornage BD. Peripheral nerves of the extremities: Imaging with US. Radiology 1988;167:179–82.
-
- Bowen BC, Pattany PM, Saraf-Lavi E, Maravilla KR. The brachial plexus: Normal anatomy, pathology, and MR imaging. Neuroimaging Clin N Am 2004;14:59–85.
-
- Park HR, Lee GS, Kim IS, Chang JC. Brachial plexus injury in adults. Nerve 2017;3:1–11.
-
- Marquez Neto OR, Leite MS, Freitas T, Mendelovitz P, Villela EA, Kessler IM. The role of magnetic resonance imaging in the evaluation of peripheral nerves following traumatic lesion: Where do we stand?. Acta Neurochirur 2017;159:281-90.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
