Ambient air pollution and incident dementia: exploration of relevant exposure windows
- PMID: 40946897
- PMCID: PMC12477651
- DOI: 10.1016/j.envres.2025.122850
Ambient air pollution and incident dementia: exploration of relevant exposure windows
Abstract
Background: As dementia has a decades-long preclinical phase, earlier air pollution exposures may be more etiologically relevant to dementia risk than more recent exposures.
Methods: We estimated exposures at Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities (ARIC) study participant addresses to criteria air pollutants, PM components, and trace metals in several exposure windows (1990-1994, 1995-1999, 2000-2004, 2005-2009, and 1990-2009) using a chemical transport model with observation data fusing at two resolutions, 4 km (CTM-4k) and finest available resolution (CTM-FR), and to PM2.5, ozone, and NO2 using universal kriging with land-use regression and partial least squares regression (UK-LUR-PLSR). We estimated the association between each exposure/exposure window and incident dementia from ARIC Visit 5 (2011-2013) to Visit 7 (2018-2019).
Results: During follow-up (mean: 6.1 years) of 5,621 participants (mean baseline age: 76 years), 828 (14.7 %) developed dementia. Analyses did not support an association between most air pollutant exposures in any exposure window and incident dementia. However, we observed stronger associations in later time periods for PM2.5, with significant associations in the latest time period with one exposure estimation approach: (HR (95 % CI) per 1 ug/m3 higher 2005-2009 p.m.2.5 exposure for CTM-FR: 1.11 (0.99, 1.25); CTM-4k: 1.07 (0.89, 1.22), UK-LUR-PLSR: 1.13 (1.03, 1.24). We saw similar patterns for NO2, elemental carbon, Ni, and V.
Discussion: We found little evidence supporting the hypothesized greater etiologic relevance of earlier exposures on incident dementia. Spatial confounding or acceleration of pathologic processes may explain the stronger associations observed with later exposure windows.
Keywords: Air pollution; Cognition; Dementia; Exposure windows.
Copyright © 2025 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Conflict of interest statement
Declaration of competing interest The authors declare the following financial interests/personal relationships which may be considered as potential competing interests: Melinda Power reports financial support was provided by National Institutes of Health. Melinda Power reports a relationship with National Institutes of Health that includes: funding grants. Melinda Power reports a relationship with Prince George's County Health Department that includes: funding grants. Melinda Power reports a relationship with US Department of Defense that includes: funding grants. Eun Sug Park reports a relationship with National Institutes of Health that includes: funding grants. Eric Whitsel reports a relationship with National Institutes of Health that includes: funding grants. Eric Whitsel reports a relationship with Federal Aviation Administration that includes: funding grants. If there are other authors, they declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.
References
-
- Baecke JA, et al. , 1982. A short questionnaire for the measurement of habitual physical activity in epidemiological studies. Am J Clin Nutr. 36, 936–42. - PubMed
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Research Materials