This is a preprint.
Prone Positioning in a North American Cohort of Hypoxemic Patients on Mechanical Ventilation
- PMID: 40950483
- PMCID: PMC12424874
- DOI: 10.1101/2025.09.03.25334942
Prone Positioning in a North American Cohort of Hypoxemic Patients on Mechanical Ventilation
Abstract
Objective: Use of prone positioning increased among mechanically ventilated patients during the COVID-19 pandemic, but it is unknown whether implementation of this life-saving intervention was sustained. Thus, we aimed to evaluate peri-pandemic trends in proning use.
Design: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of proning use among mechanically ventilated adults, with proning rates compared across pre-pandemic (1/2018-2/2020), pandemic (3/2020-2/2022), and post-pandemic (3/2022-12/2024) periods.
Setting: 37 North American hospitals.
Patients: Mechanically ventilated patients with persistent moderate-to-severe hypoxemia (PaO2/FiO2 ≤150 mmHg, FiO2 ≥0.6, and positive end-expiratory pressure ≥5 cmH2O).
Intervention: Proning within 12 hours of meeting study hypoxemia criteria.
Measurements and main results: Among 5,760 proning-eligible patients, 1,737 (30.2%) received proning: 8.0% pre-pandemic, 44.6% pandemic, and 19.9% post-pandemic. The adjusted odds ratio (OR) for proning during pandemic versus pre-pandemic periods was 8.25 (95% Confidence Interval (CI): 6.35-10.70) and pandemic versus post-pandemic, 2.76 (95% CI: 1.83-4.17). Proning varied widely by hospital and was quantified with the median odds ratio (median change in odds of proning an identical patient admitted at a lower versus higher proning hospital) of 2.54 (95% Credible Interval (CrI): 1.75-4.58) pre-pandemic, 2.33 (95% CrI: 1.92-3.04) pandemic, and 2.58 (95% CrI: 1.99-3.73) post-pandemic. Pandemic-period patients with SARS-CoV2 were proned more than those without (OR: 4.55, [95% CI: 3.85-5.56]), but pandemic-period patients without SARS-CoV2 were still proned more than pre-pandemic (OR: 3.87, [95% CI: 2.92-5.13]) or post-pandemic patients (OR: 1.37, [95% CI: 1.03-1.83]).
Conclusions: In a North American cohort of proning-eligible patients, proning increased during the pandemic and then declined. Interventions that improve implementation of this life-saving treatment are urgently needed.
Keywords: acute lung injury; evidence-based practice; hypoxemic respiratory failure; mechanical ventilators; prone position.
Conflict of interest statement
AN received grants or contracts from the National Institutes of Health, United States Food and Drug Administration, and Alfred P. Sloan Foundation and has a leadership or fiduciary role in the International Society for Bayesian Analysis. PGL is an associate editor for Data Science, Critical Care Medicine. CAG received payment or honoraria for lectures, presentations, speakers bureaus, manuscript writing, or educational events from the Northwestern NUCATS Early Career Series, participates on the PRECISE trial data safety monitoring board or advisor board, and has a leadership or fiduciary role in American Thoracic Society Critical Care Early Career Professionals Working Group. ACO received travel support from the American Thoracic Society. GEW received grants or contracts from the National Institutes of Health, Advanced Research Projects Agency for Health, National Academy of Medicine, Gordon and Betty Moore Foundation, and John A. Hartford Foundation, lecture honoraria from the Institute for Healthcare Improvement and Worksafe BC, and has patents planned, issued, or pending with the American College of Physicians. WFP received grants or contracts from the National Institutes of Health and Greenwall Foundation. DNH received grants or contracts from Regeneron and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Influenza Vaccine Effectiveness Network and an institutional professional development stipend from Johns Hopkins University.
Figures
References
-
- Bellani G, Laffey JG, Pham T, et al. : Epidemiology, Patterns of Care, and Mortality for Patients With Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome in Intensive Care Units in 50 Countries. JAMA 2016; 315:788–800 - PubMed
-
- Schmidt M, Pham T, Arcadipane A, et al. : Mechanical Ventilation Management during Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation for Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome. An International Multicenter Prospective Cohort. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2019; 200:1002–1012 - PubMed
-
- Guérin C, Beuret P, Constantin JM, et al. : A prospective international observational prevalence study on prone positioning of ARDS patients: the APRONET (ARDS Prone Position Network) study. Intensive Care Med 2018; 44:22–37 - PubMed
-
- Duan EH, Adhikari NKJ, D’Aragon F, et al. : Management of Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome and Refractory Hypoxemia. A Multicenter Observational Study. Ann Am Thorac Soc 2017; 14:1818–1826 - PubMed
-
- Barker AK, Harlan EA, Kerlin MP, et al. : Attending Practice Variability Is a Key Component in Prone Positioning Initiation: A Retrospective Cohort Study. CHEST Crit Care 2025; 3:100158
Publication types
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Miscellaneous