Reaching international consensus on the definition of refractory migraine using the Delphi method
- PMID: 40953156
- DOI: 10.1177/03331024251367767
Reaching international consensus on the definition of refractory migraine using the Delphi method
Abstract
AimDespite its frequency in tertiary headache centers, the International Classification of Headache Disorders, 3rd edition (ICHD-3) does not include refractory migraine. Multiple definitions have been proposed with a recent 2020 proposal for both refractory migraine and resistant migraine by the European Headache Federation (EHF). The aim is to reach an international consensus on the definition of refractory migraine.MethodsThis study is a Delphi consensus carried out by a group of international experts in headache medicine. Following a focus group, a panel of 20 experts and one facilitator reviewed the EHF proposed criteria to build upon their definitions. The Delphi consensus was conducted across five rounds. Questions with >70% consensus were deemed to have strong agreement, 60-70% consensus was deemed minor agreement, and <60% deemed no agreement. A final meeting was held to discuss any concerns and specific wording.ResultsThe Delphi consensus led to the development of four key categories: refractory migraine, probable refractory migraine, resistant migraine, and treatment-responsive migraine. Similar to the EHF 2020 definitions, refractory migraine requires treatment failure of all evidence-based classes, and resistant migraine requires failure of at least three classes. Probable refractory migraine criteria were designed to account for situations where treatment access barriers may prevent trials of certain medication classes (e.g. pediatrics, low to middle-income countries, lack of insurance coverage). Finally, treatment-responsive migraine criteria were developed to allow for standardization in research studies comparing refractory or resistant migraine to migraine that is treatment-responsive.ConclusionsThese four categories may aid in enrollment for studies on pathophysiology, biomarkers, and new treatment targets. Clinically, the criteria for refractory and resistant migraine will help with clinical decision-making by reinforcing the need to try evidence-based treatments and by providing guidance regarding when to try more aggressive treatment approaches. These criteria may also increase attention to this population's disease burden to help advocate for them as a specific migraine subgroup. Field testing in diverse clinical settings will be needed, but it is recommended that ICHD-3 considers inclusion of these four categories in their appendix.
Keywords: chronic daily headache; diagnostic criteria; intractable; migraine; refractory migraine; resistant migraine.
Conflict of interest statement
Declaration of conflicting interestsDr Jennifer Robblee discloses grant support from Barrow Neurological foundation, investigator support from Eli Lilly and Abbvie, as well as paid Editorial relationship with MedLink Neurology and Neurodiem. Dr. Robblee has received personal compensation for serving on advisory boards for Tonix and Allergan/Abbvie. Dr Robblee also discloses that a family member has partial ownership of Scottsdale Providence Recovery Center.Dr Fawad Khan discloses receiving institutional research support from Marinus, Biohaven, Teva, Lundbeck and UCB; advisory fees from Eisai, Neurelis, Marinus, Epitel, Pfizer; honorarium for speaker engagements from Amgen, UCB, SK Life Science, Lundbeck, Allergan, Lilly USA, Impel Pharmaceuticals, AbbVie; honorarium for educational programs from Natus and Stratus. He serves on the Louisiana State Medical Advisory Board in a non-paid position. In non-compensated roles, and he is a board member of the Deccan Alumni Association of North America, a non-profit professional society.Dr Michael Marmura discloses receiving institutional research support from AbbVie and Teva, and advisory fees from Lundbeck, Theranica,Dr Hope O’Brien discloses participating in a speaker bureau for AbbVie, Eli Lilly, Pfizer, Biohaven (past), BDSI (past) and Scimed; participating on an advisory board for AbbVie, Eli Lilly, Pfizer, Biohaven (past), BDSI (past); participating as a consultant for Medscape and Guidepoint; Editorial Royalties for UpToDate, Research Funding from AbbVie, Eli Lilly and Vector Psychometric Group. She also reports being the American Academy of Neurology Vice-chair MMC and an Invited Speaker; American Headache Society committee member, past chair for Underrepresented committee and an invited Speaker; United Council of Neurological Subspecialties accreditation committee member; National Headache Foundation Board member; UC Master of Health Administration Program Advisory board member; Cincinnati Eye Institute Foundation Board member; and Medscape Migraine Center of Excellence Faculty consultant.Dr Lawrence Robbins discloses being a speaker for Abbvie, Impel and IdorsiaDr Marielle Kabbouche Samaha discloses investigator support to the institution for research studies from Eli Lilly, Abbvie, Teva, NIH and PICORI direct pay to her institution. Dr Kabbouche has received direct pay as a speaker from Theranica in the last two years and as a consultant for Merz pharmaceutical.Dr Morris Levin discloses an advisor role in one-day advisory board meetings with AbbVie, Biohaven, Theranica, BDSI and Linpharma; he serves as a consultant for Percept and Neurolytics. He is a member of no speakers’ boards and has no stock shares or options in any biomedical company.Dr Simona Sacco discloses personal fees as speaker or advisor for Abbott, Allergan-Abbvie, AstraZeneca, Bayer, Boheringer, Eli Lilly, Lundbeck, Pfizer and Teva. Other roles include President for the European Stroke Organisation, editor-in-chief for
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
