Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2025 Oct;27(5):e70088.
doi: 10.1111/cid.70088.

Effect of Final Abutment Timing on Immediate Implant Success in Anterior Maxilla: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Veronika Pohl  1 , Robert Haas  1 , Rebecca Rosen  1 , Nikolaus Fürhauser  1 , Sebastian Pohl  1
Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Effect of Final Abutment Timing on Immediate Implant Success in Anterior Maxilla: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Veronika Pohl et al. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2025 Oct.

Abstract

Objective: This randomized controlled trial aimed to evaluate the impact of early versus delayed change of abutment on bone levels, soft tissue, and patient satisfaction with single-tooth immediate implants.

Material and methods: In 26 patients, flapless immediate implants were placed in the anterior maxillary region (13-23). Postoperatively, all patients received a resin abutment with an emergence profile identical to that of the extracted tooth and were provided with a provisional resin crown. Based on the provisional abutment, a custom digital copy abutment made of zirconium with a titanium adapter was manufactured. The patients were randomized into two groups: the test group received the definitive zirconia abutment after 4 days, while the control group had the abutment changed after 3 months. In both groups, the definitive ceramic crowns were inserted 3 months post-surgery. The primary study outcome was the marginal bone level after 1 year, with peri-implant soft tissue (PES/Pink Esthetic Score) and oral-health-related quality of life (OHIP/Oral Health Impact Profile) defined as secondary parameters.

Results: No statistically significant differences for initial bone level remodeling or later bone loss were found between both groups after 1 year. Two prosthetic complications (one per group) required abutment replacement, but no implant failures occurred. Mean marginal bone levels were 0.71 ± 0.95 mm (mesial: 0.55 ± 0.97 mm, distal: 0.86 ± 1.07 mm) in the test group and 0.22 ± 0.93 mm (mesial: 0.15 ± 1.10 mm, distal: 0.30 ± 0.89 mm) in the control group. The Pink Esthetic Score (PES) was 11.9 ± 1.6 in the test group and 10.62 ± 2.87 in the control group (p = 0.39), showing no significant difference in esthetic outcomes. The Oral Health Impact Profile (OHIP) score at 6 months was also not statistically significant for both groups.

Conclusion: In immediate implants in the anterior maxilla, the timing of definitive zirconia abutment placement (4 days versus after 3 months) did not result in any statistically significant differences in peri-implant bone level, peri-implant esthetics, or patient-related quality of life.

Keywords: OHIP; PES; RCT; bone level; immediate implant; immediately restored implant.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. J. Chen, M. Cai, J. Yang, T. Aldhohrah, and Y. Wang, “Immediate Versus Early or Conventional Loading Dental Implants With Fixed Prostheses: A Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis of Randomized Controlled Clinical Trials,” Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry 122, no. 6 (2019): 516–536, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2019.05.013.
    1. M. Chang, J. L. Wennström, P. Odman, and B. Andersson, “Implant Supported Single‐Tooth Replacements Compared to Contralateral Natural Teeth. Crown and Soft Tissue Dimensions,” Clinical Oral Implants Research 10, no. 3 (1999): 185–194, https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600‐0501.1999.100301.x.
    1. I. Sanz, M. Garcia‐Gargallo, D. Herrera, C. Martin, E. Figuero, and M. Sanz, “Surgical Protocols for Early Implant Placement in Post‐Extraction Sockets: A Systematic Review,” Clinical Oral Implants Research 23, no. Suppl 5 (2012): 67–79, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600‐0501.2011.02339.x.
    1. R. Fürhauser, L. Fürhauser, N. Fürhauser, V. Pohl, B. Pommer, and R. Haas, “Bucco‐Palatal Implant Position and Its Impact on Soft Tissue Level in the Maxillary Esthetic Zone,” Clinical Oral Implants Research 33, no. 11 (2022): 1125–1134, https://doi.org/10.1111/clr.13995.
    1. Y. Sasada and D. L. Cochran, “Implant‐Abutment Connections: A Review of Biologic Consequences and Peri‐Implantitis Implications,” International Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Implants 32, no. 6 (2017): 1296–1307, https://doi.org/10.11607/jomi.5732.

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources