Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Nov;49(11):3060-3066.
doi: 10.1002/wjs.70095. Epub 2025 Sep 15.

Artificial Intelligence-Derived Intramuscular Adipose Tissue Assessment Predicts Perineal Wound Complications Following Abdominoperineal Resection

Affiliations

Artificial Intelligence-Derived Intramuscular Adipose Tissue Assessment Predicts Perineal Wound Complications Following Abdominoperineal Resection

Alex Besson et al. World J Surg. 2025 Nov.

Abstract

Background: Perineal wound complications following abdominoperineal resection (APR) significantly impacts patient morbidity. Despite various closure techniques, no method has proven superior. Body composition is a key factor influencing postoperative outcomes. AI-assisted CT scan analysis is an accurate and efficient approach to assessing body composition. This study aimed to evaluate whether body composition characteristics can predict perineal wound complications following APR.

Methods: A retrospective cohort study of APR patients from 2012 to 2024 was conducted, comparing primary closure and inferior gluteal artery myocutaneous (IGAM) flap closure outcomes. Preoperative CT scans were analyzed using a validated AI model to measure lumbosacral skeletal muscle (SM), intramuscular adipose tissue (IMAT), visceral adipose tissue, and subcutaneous adipose tissue.

Results: Greater IMAT volume correlated with increased wound dehiscence in males undergoing IGAM closure (40% vs. 4.8% and p = 0.027). Lower SM-to-IMAT volume ratio was associated with higher wound infection rates (60% vs. 19% and p = 0.04). Closure technique did not significantly impact wound infection or dehiscence rates.

Conclusion: This study is the first to use AI derived 3D body composition analysis to assess perineal wound complications after APR. IMAT volume significantly influences wound healing in male patients having IGAM reconstruction.

Keywords: artificial intelligence; body composition; proctectomy; rectal neoplasm.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
AI mediated body composition analysis. Skeletal muscle (light blue), IMAT (green), VAT (orange), and SAT (red).
FIGURE 2
FIGURE 2
Patient inclusion/exclusion flow diagram.

References

    1. Buscail E., Canivet C., Shourick J., et al., “Perineal Wound Closure Following Abdominoperineal Resection and Pelvic Exenteration for Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis,” Cancers 13, no. 4 (2021): 721, 10.3390/cancers13040721. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Riva C., Kelly M. E., Vitellaro M., et al., “A Comparison of Surgical Techniques for Perineal Wound Closure Following Perineal Excision: A Systematic Review and Network Meta‐Analysis,” Techniques in Coloproctology 27, no. 12 (2023): 1351–1366, 10.1007/s10151-023-02868-1. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Khattak M. A., Khan A. N., Jafferi S., Iqbal Y., Abdulrasheed H., and McArthur D., “Perineal Wound Healing Following Abdominoperineal Resection of the Rectum,” Cureus 16, no. 8 (2024): e66318, 10.7759/cureus.66318. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Yang X., Wei M. T., He Y. Z., et al., “Primary vs Myocutaneous Flap Closure of Perineal Defects Following Abdominoperineal Resection for Colorectal Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis,” Colorectal Disease 21, no. 2 (2019): 138–155, 10.1111/codi.14471. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Bimurzayeva A., Kim M. J., Ahn J.‐S., et al., “Three‐Dimensional Body Composition Parameters Using Automatic Volumetric Segmentation Allow Accurate Prediction of Colorectal Cancer Outcomes,” Journal of Cachexia, Sarcopenia and Muscle 15, no. 1 (2024): 281–291, 10.1002/jcsm.13404. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

MeSH terms