Assessing the impact of dyslexia laws on identification and reading achievement: an empirical analysis
- PMID: 40956540
- DOI: 10.1007/s11881-025-00347-w
Assessing the impact of dyslexia laws on identification and reading achievement: an empirical analysis
Abstract
Dyslexia legislation has been increasingly enacted across US states to improve the early identification and support of students with dyslexia. However, little is known about the extent to which these laws have influenced dyslexia identification rates and reading achievement outcomes. We examined the impact of state dyslexia laws using repeated cross-sectional, student-level data from the National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP) fourth-grade reading assessments collected between 2003 and 2022. We assess changes in Specific Learning Disability (SLD) identification rates and reading performance before and after dyslexia law enactment across states. Across 47 states with relevant laws, 26 states (55%) showed no significant change in SLD identification rates, 13 states (28%) experienced increases, and 8 states (17%) experienced decreases. For reading achievement among students with SLD, 4 states (9%) showed significant improvement, 20 states (43%) showed declines, and 23 states (49%) showed no change. These mixed results are consistent with the wide variation in scope and implementation of dyslexia laws, as well as broader national trends in reading achievement. Importantly, most states do not require students with characteristics of dyslexia to be classified under SLD, so changes in identification rates are not a direct expectation of such legislation. Our findings suggest that enactment alone is insufficient to drive consistent improvements; effective implementation, integration with broader literacy reforms, and stronger monitoring systems are likely needed for these policies to achieve their intended goals.
Keywords: Dyslexia legislation; NAEP; Reading achievement; Specific Learning Disability.
© 2025. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC.
Conflict of interest statement
Declarations. Conflict of interest: The authors declare no competing interests.
References
-
- Bernal, J. L., Cummins, S., & Gasparrini, A. (2017). Interrupted time series regression for the evaluation of public health interventions: A tutorial. International Journal of Epidemiology, 46(1), 348–355. https://doi.org/10.1093/ije/dyw098 - DOI
-
- Boyes, M. E., Leitão, S., Claessen, M., Badcock, N. A., & Nayton, M. (2020). Correlates of externalising and internalising problems in children with dyslexia: An analysis of data from clinical casefiles. Australian Psychologist, 55(1), 62–72. https://doi.org/10.1111/ap.12409 - DOI
-
- Connor, C. M., Alberto, P. A., Compton, D. L., & O’Connor, R. E. (2014). Improving reading outcomes for students with or at risk for reading disabilities: A synthesis of the contributions from the Institute of Education Sciences Research Centers (NCSER 2014–3000). National Center for Special Education Research, Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education. https://ies.ed.gov/ies/2025/01/improving-reading-outcomes-students-or-ri... . Accessed 28 Feb 2025.
-
- de Beer, J., Engels, J., Heerkens, Y., & van der Klink, J. (2014). Factors influencing work participation of adults with developmental dyslexia: A systematic review. BMC Public Health, 14(1), Article 1. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-14-77
-
- Duff, D. M., Hendricks, A. E., Fitton, L., & Adlof, S. M. (2023). Reading and math achievement in children with dyslexia, developmental language disorder, or typical development: Achievement gaps persist from second through fourth grades. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 56(5), 371–391. https://doi.org/10.1177/00222194221105515 - DOI
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
