The autonomic nervous system: Time for a conceptual reframing?
- PMID: 40956984
- PMCID: PMC12645539
- DOI: 10.1113/JP288973
The autonomic nervous system: Time for a conceptual reframing?
Abstract
After having reviewed the history of the autonomic nervous system (ANS), and how Langley's concept of the ANS was born, we suggest that the terms 'cranial visceral' and 'spinal visceral' nerves are more appropriate. We discuss the limitations of the terms 'sympathetic' and 'parasympathetic' nerves and functions and suggest a way forward that avoids these terms altogether. We propose that the term 'autonomic' should not refer to a separate nervous system, because somatic components of the nervous system can also operate automatically, i.e. in a manner that is not under voluntary control.
Keywords: ANS; Langley; autonomic nervous system; history; parasympathetic; sympathetic.
© 2025 The Author(s). The Journal of Physiology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of The Physiological Society.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare no conflicts of interest related to this work.
References
-
- Anonymous . (1963). Sir Michael Foster (1836‐1907). Journal of the American Medical Association, 186(13), 1167.
-
- Barandiaran, X. E. (2017). Autonomy and enactivism. Towards a theory of sensorimotor autonomous agency. Topoi, 36(3), 409–430.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources