Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2025 Sep;37(9):745-750.
doi: 10.1038/s41443-025-01161-z. Epub 2025 Sep 16.

Sexual and urological reconstruction following penectomy for penile cancer: phalloplasty

Affiliations
Review

Sexual and urological reconstruction following penectomy for penile cancer: phalloplasty

Andrea Gobbo et al. Int J Impot Res. 2025 Sep.

Abstract

Phalloplasty following penectomy for penile cancer presents a complex reconstructive challenge, requiring restoration of urinary and sexual function while addressing anatomical and psychological sequelae. Unlike gender-affirming phalloplasty, this procedure is complicated by previous surgery and potential anatomical deficits. However, limited data exist to guide reconstruction in this cohort. This narrative review summarises available evidence on phalloplasty post-penectomy. A systematic search identified six relevant studies, including 48 patients, with follow-up ranging from 1 to 150 months. The radial artery free flap (RAP) and anterolateral thigh flap (ALTP) are the preferred techniques, each with distinct advantages and limitations. While RAP offers superior tactile recovery, ALTP reduces donor site morbidity. Complication rates are high, particularly urethral strictures and fistulae, affecting up to 64.3% of cases. Despite these risks, functional outcomes, including standing micturition and sexual activity, are achievable and patient satisfaction remains high. Challenges include extrapolating data from transgender cohorts and managing psychosocial concerns. A multidisciplinary approach is essential for optimising patient selection, counselling, and long-term outcomes. Further research is needed to refine surgical techniques, improve complication management, and explore innovative reconstructive strategies.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: The authors declare no competing interests. Ethical approval: Ethical approval was not required for this study.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1. Flowchart diagram.
The figure illustrates the selection process.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2. Penile amputation.
The figures shows the outcomes of penile amputation with perineal urethrostomy.
Fig. 3
Fig. 3. Outcome fo first stage phalloplasty.
The patient has a drain inside the phallus to prevent hematoma, a suprapubic catheter, and a transurethral catheter.
Fig. 4
Fig. 4. Urethra construction.
Urethral tabularisation around a 16ch catheter following the harvest of the radial forearm flap at the time of the first stage.
Fig. 5
Fig. 5. Phallus construction.
Construction of the phallus with integrated urethra by tubularising the phallus around the urethra. This technique is also referred to as “tube-in-tube”.
Fig. 6
Fig. 6. Penile neurovascular bundle. The figure illustrates the 2 dorsal penile nerves (marked by the yellow sloops) and the superficial dorsal penile vein (blue sloop).
One of the nerves and the vein can be used for microsurgical anastomoses following penile amputation for cancer when viable.

References

    1. Branney P, Witty K, Eardley I. Patients’ experiences of penile cancer. European Urol. 2011;59:959–61. 10.1016/j.eururo.2011.02.009. - PubMed
    1. Sosnowski R, Wolski JK, Kulpa M, Ziętalewicz U, Kosowicz M, Kalinowski T, et al. Assessment of quality of life in patients surgically treated for penile cancer: Impact of aggressiveness in surgery. Eur J Oncol Nurs. 2017;31:1–5. 10.1016/j.ejon.2017.08.011. - PubMed
    1. Yu H, Tao S, She W, Liu M, Wu Y, Lyu J. Analysis of suicide risk in adult US patients with squamous cell carcinoma: a retrospective study based on the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results database. BMJ Open. 2022;12:e061913. 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-061913. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Whyte E, Sutcliffe A, Keegan P, Clifford T, Matu J, Shannon OM, et al. Effects of partial penectomy for penile cancer on sexual function: A systematic review. PLoS One. 2022;17:e0274914. 10.1371/journal.pone.0274914. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Muneer A, Bandini M, Compérat E, De Meerleer G, Fizazi K, Gietema J, et al. Penile cancer: ESMO-EURACAN Clinical Practice Guideline for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. ESMO Open. 2024;9:103481. 10.1016/j.esmoop.2024.103481. - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources