Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2025 Apr 4;9(4):1266-1273.
doi: 10.1016/j.jseint.2025.03.007. eCollection 2025 Jul.

Blood loss, complications, and the role of suction drains in shoulder arthroplasty: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Luiz Henrique Oliveira Almeida  1 , Vitor La Banca  1   2 , Octavio Matsumoto  1 , Arthur Steven de Sá  1 , Ana Victória Palagi Viganó  1 , Gabriel Kalman  1 , Felipe Fernandes Gonzalez  2 , Guilherme Henrique Vieira Lima  1 , Joel Murachovsky  1 , Roberto Yukio Ikemoto  1
Affiliations
Review

Blood loss, complications, and the role of suction drains in shoulder arthroplasty: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Luiz Henrique Oliveira Almeida et al. JSES Int. .

Abstract

Background: Total shoulder replacement, including both anatomic and reverse procedures are one of the treatment options for shoulder arthritis and proximal humerus fractures, with consistently favorable outcomes in terms of pain relief and function improvement. During surgery, some surgeons prefer to place suction drains in the deep tissue to prevent hematomas or seromas, thereby reducing risks like wound dehiscence and infections. However, the routine use of suction drains in other orthopedic surgeries, such as hip and knee arthroplasty, has been questioned, with studies suggesting they may lead to extended hospital stays and increased need for transfusions without significantly reducing complications. Given the conflicting evidence in the literature about suction drains in shoulder arthroplasty, this study aims to evaluate their efficacy in reducing complications and in consequence the need for hospital stay and reoperations.

Methods: This systematic review followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses guidelines. The inclusion criteria encompassed studies comparing outcomes of patients undergoing shoulder arthroplasty (anatomic or reverse) with and without suction drains. Databases such as PubMed, Lilacs, Cochrane Library, and Scopus were searched, with no restrictions on language or publication date. Data extraction was performed for duration of hospital stay, transfusions, infections, wound dehiscence, reoperations, and hemoglobin changes. Meta-analyses were conducted using a random-effects model for mean differences (MDs) and odds ratios (ORs).

Results: Six studies with a total of 22,710 patients were included. The mean patient age was 68.8 years, with a slight female predominance. Anatomic and reverse shoulder arthroplasties were both commonly performed. There was no significant difference in hospital stay (MD: 8.78 hours), infection rates (OR: 0.64; 95% confidence intervals (CI): 0.30-1.35), or reoperation rates (OR: 1.62; 95% CI: 0.16-16.23) between patients with drains and those without. However, hemoglobin loss was significantly greater in the drain group (MD: 0.31; 95% CI: 0.02-0.60).

Conclusion: The use of suction drains in shoulder arthroplasty does not significantly reduce infection or wound-related complications and is associated with increased hemoglobin loss. These findings suggest that the routine use of drains in shoulder arthroplasty may not provide tangible benefits and should be reconsidered to optimize patient outcomes.

Keywords: Postoperative complications; Shoulder arthroplasty; Shoulder prosthesis; Shoulder replacement; Suction drains; Surgical blood loss; Surgical drainage.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
PRISMA flowchart illustrating the study selection process. Reasons for exclusion at various stages are noted. PRISMA, Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Risk of bias assessment using the ROBINS-I tool. Summary of risk of bias across the included studies, showing the proportion of studies at low, moderate, serious, or critical risk of bias in each domain. ROBINS-I, risk of bias in nonrandomized studies—of interventions.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Risk of bias assessment using the ROBINS-E tool. Summary of risk of bias across the included studies, showing the proportion of studies at low, moderate, serious, or critical risk of bias in each domain. ROBINS-E, risk of bias in nonrandomized studies—of exposure.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Forest plot summarizing the effect estimates for the duration of hospital stay across included studies. SD, standard deviation; MD, mean difference; CI, confidence interval.
Figure 5
Figure 5
Forest plot summarizing the effect estimates for the Hb change preoperatively and postoperatively across included studies. Hb, hemoglobin level; SD, standard deviation; MD, mean difference; CI, confidence interval.
Figure 6
Figure 6
Forest plot summarizing the effect estimates for transfusion events across included studies. OR, odds ratio; CI, confidence interval.
Figure 7
Figure 7
Forest plot summarizing the effect estimates for infection events across included studies. OR, odds ratio; CI, confidence interval.
Figure 8
Figure 8
Forest plot summarizing the effect estimates for reoperations across included studies. OR, odds ratio; CI, confidence interval.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Albasha A., Salman L.A., Elramadi A., Abudalou A., Mustafa A., Hejleh H.A.A., et al. Outcomes of drain versus no drain in total knee arthroplasty: a retrospective cohort study. Int Orthop. 2023;47:2985–2989. doi: 10.1007/s00264-023-05946-z. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Chan J.J., Cirino C.M., Huang H.H., Poeran J., Mazumdar M., Parsons B.O., et al. Drain use is associated with increased odds of blood transfusion in total shoulder arthroplasty: a population-based study. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2019;477:1700–1711. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000000728. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Cunningham G., Hughes J., Borner B., Mattern O., Taha M.E., Smith M.M., et al. A single dose of tranexamic acid reduces blood loss after reverse and anatomic shoulder arthroplasty: a randomized controlled trial. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2021;30:1553–1560. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2020.11.022. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Davies A.R., Sabharwal S., Liddle A.D., Zamora-Talaya B., Rangan A., Reilly P. Patient-reported outcomes following total shoulder arthroplasty and hemiarthroplasty: an analysis of data from the National Joint Registry. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2024;33:2411–2420. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2024.01.053. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Erickson B.J., Campbell K., Jain A., Cvetanovich G.L., Higgins J.D., Frank R.M., et al. Are post-operative drains beneficial in total and reverse total shoulder arthroplasty? Orthop Res Traumatol Open J. 2016;1:22–27. doi: 10.17140/ORTOJ-1-105. - DOI

LinkOut - more resources