Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Sep 17:e253581.
doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2025.3581. Online ahead of print.

Postoperative Pulmonary Complications in Conventional Laparoscopic vs Robot-Assisted Abdominal Surgery

Collaborators, Affiliations

Postoperative Pulmonary Complications in Conventional Laparoscopic vs Robot-Assisted Abdominal Surgery

Simon Corrado Serafini et al. JAMA Surg. .

Abstract

Importance: Robot-assisted surgery (RAS) is increasingly used for abdominal procedures; however, postoperative pulmonary complications (PPCs) are more frequent in patients undergoing RAS compared with patients undergoing conventional laparoscopic surgery (CLS).

Objective: To compare the incidence of PPCs after CLS and RAS and to determine which patient-, surgery-, and anesthesia-related factors are associated with PPCs.

Design, setting, and participants: This cohort study used the Laparoscopic and Robot-Assisted Surgery (LapRAS) database, a pooled dataset containing individual patient data of 2 worldwide prospective cohort studies: the Local Assessment of Ventilatory Management During General Anaesthesia for Surgery (LAS VEGAS) study and the Assessment of Ventilatory Management During General Anesthesia for Robotic Surgery and Its Effects on Postoperative Pulmonary Complications (AVATaR) study. Data were collected from adult patients requiring intraoperative ventilation during general anesthesia for CLS or RAS surgical procedures from 163 centers and 31 countries in the Americas, Europe, the Middle East, and North Africa from January 2013 to March 2019. Data were analyzed from December 2023 to October 2024.

Exposures: Type of surgical approach (CLS vs RAS), duration of intraoperative ventilation, and intensity of mechanical ventilation, assessed using the 4 times the driving pressure (DP) plus respiratory rate (RR) estimator (4DP + RR).

Main outcome and measures: The primary outcome was occurrence of 1 or more PPCs in the first 5 postoperative days. Mixed-effects logistic regression assessed associations with PPCs; mediation and matched cohort analyses served as sensitivity analyses.

Results: A total of 2738 patients (median [IQR] age, 56 [41-66] years; 1456 female [53.1%]) were included. PPCs occurred in 172 of 903 patients (19.0%) in the RAS group and 174 of 1835 patients (9.5%) in the CLS group (P < .001). Duration of intraoperative ventilation was longer in RAS compared with CLS (median [IQR] duration, 219 [180-270] vs 95 [68-145] minutes; P < .001) and the intensity of mechanical ventilation was higher (median [IQR] intensity, 84 [69-100] vs 72 [60-87] 4DP + RR; P < .001). PPCs were independently associated only with duration of ventilation (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 1.49; 95% CI, 1.33-1.66; P < .001), not with the surgical approach (ie, RAS vs CLS; aOR, 1.35; 95% CI, 0.72-2.54; P = .35) nor the intensity of ventilation as measured by 4DP + RR (aOR, 1.01; 95% CI, 1.01-1.01; P = .21). A post hoc analysis showed a more pronounced association of intensity of ventilation in surgical procedures of shorter duration.

Conclusions and relevance: In this cohort study, patients who received RAS vs CLS had a higher incidence of PPCs and received longer and more intense mechanical ventilation; however, only the duration of ventilation rather than intensity of ventilation or type of surgical approach (ie, RAS vs CLS) was independently associated with the occurrence of PPCs, indicating that the longer duration of ventilation in RAS underlies the higher incidence of PPCs observed in those who undergo this type of surgery.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of Interest Disclosures: Dr Serpa Neto reported receiving personal fees from Hamilton Medical outside the submitted work. Dr Gregoretti reported receiving personal fees from Philips, Vivosl, and Air Liquide outside the submitted work. Dr Gama de Abreu reported receiving personal fees from Ambu Inc outside the submitted work. Dr Ball reported receiving fees for lectures from GE Healthcare outside the submitted work. No other disclosures were reported.

References

    1. Serpa Neto A, Hemmes SNT, Barbas CSV, et al. ; PROVE Network investigators . Incidence of mortality and morbidity related to postoperative lung injury in patients who have undergone abdominal or thoracic surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet Respir Med. 2014;2(12):1007-1015. doi: 10.1016/S2213-2600(14)70228-0 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Chopra S, Srivastava A, Tewari A. Robotic radical prostatectomy: The new gold standard. Arab J Urol. 2012;10(1):23-31. doi: 10.1016/j.aju.2011.12.005 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Assessment of Ventilation during general AnesThesia for Robotic surgery (AVATaR) Study Investigators; PROtective VEntilation (PROVE) Network; Writing Committee Members; Steering Committee Members; AVATaR Investigators . Ventilation and outcomes following robotic-assisted abdominal surgery: an international, multicentre observational study. Br J Anaesth. 2021;126(2):533-543. doi: 10.1016/j.bja.2020.08.058 - DOI - PubMed
    1. LAS VEGAS investigators . Epidemiology, practice of ventilation and outcome for patients at increased risk of postoperative pulmonary complications: LAS VEGAS—an observational study in 29 countries. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2017;34(8):492-507. doi: 10.1097/EJA.0000000000000646 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Tharp WG, Murphy S, Breidenstein MW, et al. Body habitus and dynamic surgical conditions independently impair pulmonary mechanics during robotic-assisted laparoscopic surgery. Anesthesiology. 2020;133(4):750-763. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0000000000003442 - DOI - PubMed