Cytomegalovirus-selected blood components in allogeneic stem cell transplantation: A follow-up survey of English transplant centre practices
- PMID: 40963142
- DOI: 10.1111/tme.70014
Cytomegalovirus-selected blood components in allogeneic stem cell transplantation: A follow-up survey of English transplant centre practices
Abstract
Background: Cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection remains a major cause of morbidity and mortality after allogeneic stem cell transplantation (aSCT). In 2012, the UK Advisory Committee for the Safety of Tissues and Organs (SaBTO) recommended that CMV-unselected (CMV-U) blood components could be safely transfused to this population without increasing the risk of transfusion-transmitted CMV (TTI-CMV). A 2015 survey of UK transplant centres found that 22.7% of aSCT centres did not follow this recommendation. In response, a subsequent good practice paper addressed concerns regarding the determination of pre-transplant CMV serostatus. Annual Serious Hazards of Transfusion (SHOT) reports continue to reassure, with no emerging safety concerns linked to the increased use of CMV-U blood components in this setting.
Objectives: To clarify changes in English practice regarding the provision of CMV-U blood components for potential allogeneic stem cell recipients and to identify factors contributing to the continued use of CMV-seronegative (CMV-N) blood components outside SaBTO recommendations.
Methods: We surveyed English aSCT centres to establish current practices and perceptions.
Results: Of the 32 English transplant centres, 28 responded (88%), 19 adult and nine paediatric centres; 10.7% continue to provide CMV-N components to all CMV-N potential aSCT recipients. Cited reasons include concerns for patients with primary immunodeficiency syndromes and a misperception that TTI-CMV is a 'never event'. Furthermore, 17.9% of centres continue to provide CMV-N components contrary to SaBTO recommendations, citing risks of CMV disease in primary immunodeficiency syndromes, resolution of ambiguous CMV serostatus, and HIV infection.
Conclusion: Adherence to SaBTO guidance on transfusion of CMV-U blood components to aSCT recipients continues to improve, but further changes are likely to be challenging, based on the survey responses received and may require international collaboration.
© 2025 British Blood Transfusion Society.
References
REFERENCES
-
- Griffiths P, Reeves M. Pathogenesis of human cytomegalovirus in the immunocompromised host. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2021;19(12):759‐773. doi:10.1038/s41579‐021‐00582‐z
-
- Ziemann M, Thiele T. Transfusion‐transmitted CMV infection—current knowledge and future perspectives. Transfus Med. 2017;27(4):238‐248. doi:10.1111/tme.12437
-
- Beckman N, Seghatchian J. The UK strategy for monitoring universal leucodepletion. Transfus Sci. 1999;21(2):147‐151. doi:10.1016/s0955‐3886(99)00089‐2
-
- UK Government. Cytomegalovirus tested blood components position statement. 2012 https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/sabto-report-of-the-cytomegal...
-
- Morton S, Peniket A, Malladi R, Murphy M. Provision of cellular blood components to CMV‐seronegative patients undergoing allogeneic stem cell transplantation in the UK: survey of UK transplant centres. Transfus Med. 2017;27(6):444‐450. doi:10.1111/tme.12461
Publication types
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
