Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Oct;22(5):e70202.
doi: 10.1111/tct.70202.

Person-Centred: Codesign With People With Disability to Improve Health Professions Education

Donya Eghrari  1 , Carolyn Cracknell  1 , Michelle L Wilcox  2 , Tarli Sali  2 , Emma Asscher  2 , Tess McCarthy  2 , Joanne Bolton  1
Affiliations

Person-Centred: Codesign With People With Disability to Improve Health Professions Education

Donya Eghrari et al. Clin Teach. 2025 Oct.

Abstract

This study used collaborative autoethnography (CAE) to explore the codesign process by investigating the experiences of team members involved in developing the Healthy Discussions Program, a 3-h educational programme designed to improve communication between health professionals and people with disability. The programme was developed collaboratively by the Office of the Public Advocate (OPA), OPA's Lived Experience Advisory Committee (LEAC) and academics from the University of Melbourne. Drawing on participatory design research methodology, this educational research explored the group's experience of codesign using collaborative autoethnography. Data were collected through individual and research team reflections as well as a focus group and interviews with LEAC members, followed by iterative thematic analysis. Five themes were identified describing the codesign process: (1) human rights, (2) power sharing, (3) open communication, (4) accessibility and inclusion and (5) collaborative leadership. Human rights were identified as a central driver, embedded within all other themes. Collaborators emphasised the need for authentic partnerships, inclusive communication, equitable remuneration, and support for long-term engagement. The CAE enabled the research team to critically reflect on assumptions, power dynamics and systemic barriers while exploring their positionality and fostering inclusive knowledge generation. This study contributes to emerging frontiers on codesigned health professional curricula by highlighting the human rights and relational elements essential for meaningful collaboration. It demonstrates how codesign, when grounded in rights-based and relational principles, can enrich tertiary health professions education development. The findings offer guiding principles for tertiary educators seeking to authentically codesign health education with the communities they aim to serve.

Keywords: codesign; collaborative autoethnography; critical reflection; disability; health professions education; human rights; patient voice.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
The Healthy Discussions Program.
FIGURE 2
FIGURE 2
Steps involved in data collection and analysis.
FIGURE 3
FIGURE 3
Human rights approach for effective codesigned curriculum.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. World Health Organisation (WHO) , “Disability,” (2025), Accessed in May 2025, https://wwwwhoint/health‐topics/disability#tab=tab_1.
    1. Temple J. B., Kelaher M., and Williams R., “Discrimination and Avoidance Due to Disability in Australia: Evidence From a National Cross Sectional Survey,” BMC Public Health 18 (2018): 1–13. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Australian Institute for Health and Welfare (AIHW) , “People With Disability in Australia,” (2024) retrieved on15 April 2025, https://wwwaihwgovau/reports/disability/people‐with‐disability‐in‐austra....
    1. Bracken R. C., Richman K. A., Garden R., et al., “Developing Disability‐Focused Pre‐Health and Health Professions Curricula,” Journal of Medical Humanities 44, no. 4 (2023): 553–576. - PMC - PubMed
    1. McEwin A. and Ronalds C., “Royal Commission Into Violence, Abuse, Neglect and Exploitation of People With Disability,” Intellectual Disability Australasia 40, no. 3 (2019): 18–19.