A comparison of women and men with small abdominal aortic aneurysms
- PMID: 40966672
- PMCID: PMC12445839
- DOI: 10.1093/bjs/znaf185
A comparison of women and men with small abdominal aortic aneurysms
Abstract
Background: Sex-related differences between men and women with small abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAAs) have implications for patient care and research. Women are less likely to be affected by AAA than men in the United States. This study explored sex-related differences in patient characteristics, aneurysm growth and clinical outcomes in the Non-invasive Treatment of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Clinical Trial (N-TA3CT).
Method: : We conducted a retrospective cohort study performing a secondary analysis of data from N-TA3CT (NCT01756833), a placebo-controlled, RCT assessing doxycycline treatment of AAA. We included 166 N-TA3CT participants with baseline AAA maximum transverse diameter ≤ 4.5 cm and at least one follow-up CT scan. We compared patient characteristics, aneurysm growth rates, adverse events, and clinical outcomes between men and women.
Results: Among 166 participants, 35 (21.1%) were women and 131 (78.9%) were men. Women were more likely than men to have a family history of AAA (31.4%% versus 16.0%, P = 0.05). Women were less likely to take statins (68.6% versus 84.7%, P = 0.05) or any antiplatelet agent (48.6% versus 77.9%, P = 0.001). Women had significantly faster annual AAA growth rates than men (0.21 versus 0.16 cm/year, P < 0.001).
Conclusions: Within the size range of 3.5-4.5 cm, AAAs grow faster in women than in men. Women with AAA report a family history of AAA more frequently than men do.
© The Author(s) 2025. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of BJS Foundation Ltd. All rights reserved. For commercial re-use, please contact reprints@oup.com for reprints and translation rights for reprints. All other permissions can be obtained through our RightsLink service via the Permissions link on the article page on our site—for further information please contact journals.permissions@oup.com.
References
-
- A comparative study of the prevalence of abdominal aortic aneurysms in the United Kingdom, Denmark, and Australia. J Med Screen 2001;8:46–50 - PubMed
-
- Derubertis BG, Trocciola SM, Ryer EJ, Pieracci FM, McKinsey JF, Faries PL et al. Abdominal aortic aneurysm in women: prevalence, risk factors, and implications for screening. J Vasc Surg 2007;46:630–635 - PubMed
-
- Owens DK, Davidson KW, Krist AH, Barry MJ, Cabana M, Caughey AB et al. Screening for abdominal aortic aneurysm: US preventive services task force recommendation statement. JAMA 2019;322:2211–2218 - PubMed
-
- Svensjö S, Björck M, Wanhainen A. Current prevalence of abdominal aortic aneurysm in 70-year-old women. Br J Surg 2013;100:367–372 - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
