The health, environmental, and cost implications of providing healthy and sustainable school meals for every child by 2030: a global modelling study
- PMID: 40967233
- DOI: 10.1016/j.lanplh.2025.06.002
The health, environmental, and cost implications of providing healthy and sustainable school meals for every child by 2030: a global modelling study
Erratum in
-
Correction to Lancet Planet Health 9: 101278.Lancet Planet Health. 2026 Dec 1:101407. doi: 10.1016/j.lanplh.2025.101407. Online ahead of print. Lancet Planet Health. 2026. PMID: 41544634 No abstract available.
Abstract
Background: School meal programmes are thought to improve dietary behaviour in children, with benefits sustained throughout the life course, making them important catalysts for wider food-system change. However, only one in five children globally currently receives school meals. We estimated the potential effects of extending school meal coverage to all children by 2030 for dietary health; the environmental effects related to diets; and the costs of diets at global, regional, and national levels.
Methods: We conducted health, environmental, and cost assessments of future scenarios of school meal coverage, meal frequency, meal composition, and food wastage. In the health assessment, we used statistical methods and a comparative risk assessment to estimate short-term changes in undernourishment and long-term changes in dietary risks and mortality. In the environmental assessment, we used food-related environmental footprints to analyse how changes in dietary composition and food waste affect greenhouse gas emissions, land use, and freshwater use. In the cost assessment, we used an international dataset of food prices to estimate changes in diet costs, and we used estimates of the social cost of carbon and the costs of illness to estimate changes in the costs of climate-change damages and in health-related costs.
Findings: Extending school meal programmes to all children globally by 2030 could be associated with substantial health and environmental benefits globally and in each country. In the model assessments, the prevalence of undernourishment in food-insecure populations was reduced by a quarter due to having an additional meal at school; more than 1 million cases of non-communicable diseases were prevented globally per year if dietary habits were partly sustained into adulthood; and food-related environmental effects were halved if meal composition adhered to recommendations for healthy and sustainable diets and food waste was reduced. Increasing school meal coverage incurred additional meal-related costs that ranged from 0·1% of gross domestic product (GDP) in high-income countries to 1·0% of GDP in low-income countries. Reductions in the external costs of climate-change damages and the costs of illness compensated for the costs of providing meals in line with health and sustainable diets.
Interpretation: Universal school meal coverage could make important contributions to improving children's health, the food security of their families, and the sustainability of food systems. However, dedicated policy and financial support will be required to close the gap in school meal coverage, especially in low-income countries.
Funding: Research Consortium for School Health and Nutrition.
Copyright © 2025 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.
Conflict of interest statement
Declaration of interests The Research Consortium for School Health and Nutrition is supported by financial contributions from the International Development Research Centre; Dubai Cares; Federal Ministry for Economic Cooperation and Development, Germany; International Development Research Centre, Canada; Novo Nordisk Foundation; Norwegian Agency for Development Cooperation; Rockefeller Foundation; US Department of Agriculture; and the UN World Food Programme. The Research Consortium for School Health and Nutrition has received in-kind support from the Academy of Nutritionists and Dietetics, the Food and Agriculture Organization of the UN, the Brazilian Government, the Finnish Government, the French Government, the London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, the National Institutes of Health, the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, and the World Bank Group. All authors declare no competing interests.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Miscellaneous
