Is cross-platform training here? A review of robotic surgery curricula
- PMID: 40968349
- DOI: 10.1007/s11701-025-02789-1
Is cross-platform training here? A review of robotic surgery curricula
Abstract
Introduction: Robotic surgery now involves more robots of different 'types'. Training so far has been type-specific and delivered by the manufacturer. From this context emerges the need for robotic training earlier in a surgical career with content that includes cross-platform generic principles. This timely review determines the extent to which these needs are being met.
Methods: A systematic search identified studies on curricula for surgeons in training.
Results: Of 79 studies, 25 were included, involving basic skills (6 studies), general surgery (12 studies), gynaecology (4 studies), urology (1 study), and Trans-Oral-Robotic-Surgery (2 studies). Studies varied in size (4-70 participants), were largely observational, based in high-income countries, and used da Vinci. Teaching methods varied. Basic robotic and device training used virtual reality (VR), inanimate models, and team training. Procedural training involved synthetic models, surgical videos and robotic access in the operating room. Outcome measures included reactions, technical skills measurement, comparison to expert performance, and real-world activity (e.g., participation in robotic surgery, robotic certification).
Conclusions: This review captures the cumulative nature of surgical education. The sequence involves simulation, real-world participation, metric benchmarks, certification, and service delivery. No study here captured all steps. Studies were small, predominantly from the US, on one robot type, and resource-intensive. This restricts generalisability. A global solution to robotic training should be scalable, of high educational value yet lean on resources, and cover the commonality across robot types. Training embedded in real-world service delivery is sustainable and would also facilitate training transition from industry to institution, towards a cross-platform curriculum.
Keywords: Global surgery; Robotic curriculum; Robotic platform; Robotic surgery; Telesurgery.
© 2025. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag London Ltd., part of Springer Nature.
Conflict of interest statement
Declarations. Conflict of interest: The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
References
-
- Pal A, Gamage R (2024) Robotic abdominopelvic surgery: a systematic review of cross-platform outcomes. J Robot Surg 18(1):386. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11701-024-02144-w - DOI - PubMed
-
- Ballas D, Cesta M, Roulette GD, Rusnak M, Ahmed R (2018) Emergency undocking in robotic surgery: a simulation curriculum. J Vis Exp 135:57286. https://doi.org/10.3791/57286 - DOI
-
- Mariani A, Pellegrini E, Enayati N, Kazanzides P, Vidotto M, De Momi E (2018) Design and evaluation of a performance-based adaptive curriculum for robotic surgical training: a pilot study. Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc 2018:2162–2165. https://doi.org/10.1109/EMBC.2018.8512728 - DOI - PubMed
-
- Satava RM, Stefanidis D, Levy JS, Smith R, Martin JR, Monfared S, Timsina LR, Darzi AW, Moglia A, Brand TC, Dorin RP, Dumon KR, Francone TD et al (2020) Proving the effectiveness of the fundamentals of robotic surgery (FRS) skills curriculum: a single-blinded, multispecialty, multi-institutional randomized control trial. Randomized Controlled Trial Ann Surg. 272(2):384–392. https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0000000000003220 - DOI - PubMed
-
- Martin JR, Stefanidis D, Dorin RP, Goh AC, Satava RM, Levy JS (2021) Demonstrating the effectiveness of the fundamentals of robotic surgery (FRS) curriculum on the robotix mentor virtual reality simulation platform. J Robot Surg 15(2):187–193. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11701-020-01085-4 - DOI - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Miscellaneous