Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Sep 17;10(5):e70253.
doi: 10.1002/lio2.70253. eCollection 2025 Oct.

Evaluation of Vestibular Evoked Myogenic Potentials in Different Dynamic Equilibrium Conditions

Affiliations

Evaluation of Vestibular Evoked Myogenic Potentials in Different Dynamic Equilibrium Conditions

Nihal Evran et al. Laryngoscope Investig Otolaryngol. .

Abstract

Objectives: This study aimed to investigate balance system modifications under different conditions using cervical Vestibular Evoked Myogenic Potentials (c-VEMP) testing. Specifically, we examined vestibular compensation mechanisms in various dynamic balance positions through evoked potential analysis.

Methods: The study conducted c-VEMP test repetitions on 45 healthy subjects under different conditions. Participants underwent comprehensive otoscopic examination and hearing and balance assessments, with only those demonstrating normal hearing included in the analysis. c-VEMP testing was performed under three distinct conditions: condition 1 (standing on a flat surface with eyes open), condition 2 (standing on a flat surface with eyes closed), and condition 3 (standing on a FoamPad with eyes open). The analysis evaluated P1-N1 latencies and amplitudes in c-VEMP responses, with subsequent statistical analysis of the collected data.

Results: Analysis revealed statistically significant differences in P1-N1 amplitudes and latencies in left ears when comparing conditions 1 and 2 (p < 0.01). Right ears demonstrated significant differences only in amplitudes between conditions 1 and 2 (p < 0.01). Comparison of conditions 2 and 3 yielded statistically significant differences in P1-N1 amplitudes and latencies for left ears (p < 0.01), while right ears showed significant differences in amplitudes and N1 latency only (p < 0.01). No significant differences were observed in either ear when comparing conditions 1 and 3 (p > 0.05).

Conclusion: Our findings suggest that while the vestibular system is fundamental, visual input plays a more substantial role in balance maintenance compared to proprioceptive input.

Level of evidence: 3.

Keywords: evoked potential; postural balance; proprioception; vestibular evoked myogenic potential; vestibular system.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
Representative c‐VEMP waveform/diagram of an individual in three different dynamic equilibrium conditions (written permission was obtained from the individual for the diagram).

References

    1. Helminski J. O., Zee D. S., Janssen I., and Hain T. C., “Effectiveness of Particle Repositioning Maneuvers in the Treatment of Benign Paroxysmal Positional Vertigo: A Systematic Review,” Physical Therapy 90, no. 5 (2010): 663–678, 10.2522/ptj.20090071. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Paulus W. M., Straube A., and Brandt T. H., “Visual Stabilization of Posture,” Brain 107, no. 4 (1984): 1143–1163, 10.1093/brain/107.4.1143. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Woollacott M. and Shumway‐Cook A., “Attention and the Control of Posture and Gait: A Review of an Emerging Area of Research,” Gait & Posture 16, no. 1 (2002): 1–14, 10.1016/s0966-6362(01)00156-4. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Peterka R. J., “Sensorimotor Integration in Human Postural Control,” Journal of Neurophysiology 88, no. 3 (2002): 1097–1118. - PubMed
    1. Colebatch J., Halmagyi G., and Skuse N., “Myogenic Potentials Generated by a Click‐Evoked Vestibulocollic Reflex,” Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry 57, no. 2 (1994): 190–197. - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources