Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Oct;45(10):e70330.
doi: 10.1111/liv.70330.

Beyond Risk Factors: Rethinking Hepatitis B and Hepatitis C Screening in Primary Care

Affiliations

Beyond Risk Factors: Rethinking Hepatitis B and Hepatitis C Screening in Primary Care

Elena Vargas-Accarino et al. Liver Int. 2025 Oct.

Abstract

Introduction: Most international guidelines recommend screening for hepatitis B virus (HBV) and hepatitis C virus (HCV) only for individuals with risk factors or elevated ALT levels. However, this approach may not suffice to eradicate viral hepatitis. This study evaluates the application of EASL HBV and HCV screening guidelines in primary care centres (PCCs).

Methods: The study included two components: (1) A retrospective review (January 2021-March 2023) of microbiology data to determine testing rates, analyse clinical characteristics, and assess management; and (2) A prospective intervention (March-April 2024) involving HBV and HCV screening and risk factor surveys for all adults attending two PCCs for blood collection.

Results: In the retrospective analysis of 90 170 patients, HBV and HCV screening rates were 16% and 10%, respectively. Among HBsAg-positive patients (n = 84 (0.5%)), 67% lacked risk factors or elevated ALT. Among anti-HCV-positive (n = 277 (3%)) and HCV RNA-positive (n = 45 (0.5%)) patients, 54% and 46% respectively lacked these indicators. In the prospective study of 1030 patients (mean age 55, 39.6% men, 73% Spanish), anti-HCV was detected in 1.16% of cases (HCV RNA in 0.19%). Of these, 67% lacked risk factors or elevated ALT. No HBsAg-positive cases were identified, and hepatitis B vaccination status was uncertain for 50% of patients.

Conclusion: Risk factor-based screening for HBV and HCV in primary care is a suboptimal approach. More than half of the patients testing positive lacked identifiable risk factors or elevated ALT levels. Universal one-time screening for all adults could address these limitations and significantly advance viral hepatitis elimination efforts.

Keywords: hepatitis B; hepatitis C; primary care; screening.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

M.B. has served as a speaker and advisory board member for Gilead, Roche, and Arbutus. J.C.R.‐C. has served as a speaker for Gilead.

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
Flow chart of the study results. (A) Hepatitis C screening. (B) Hepatitis B screening.
FIGURE 2
FIGURE 2
Flowchart of the prospective hepatitis C screening.

References

    1. Spearman W., Dusheiko G. M., Hellard M., and Sonderup M., “Hepatitis C,” Lancet 394 (2019): 1451. - PubMed
    1. Cooke G. S., Andrieux‐Meyer I., Applegate T. L., et al., “Accelerating the Elimination of Viral Hepatitis: A Lancet Gastroenterology & Hepatology Commission,” Lancet Gastroenterology & Hepatology 4, no. 2 (2019): 135–184. - PubMed
    1. World Health Organization , Combating Hepatitis B and C to Reach Elimination by 2030 (World Health Organ, 2016), http://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/10665/206453/1/WHO_HIV_2016.
    1. World Health Organization , Global Progress Report on HIV, Viral Hepatitis and Sexually Transmitted Infections (World Health Organization, 2021), https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789240027077.
    1. Blach S., Terrault N. A., Tacke F., et al., “Global Change in Hepatitis C Virus Prevalence and Cascade of Care Between 2015 and 2020: A Modelling Study,” Lancet Gastroenterology & Hepatology 7, no. 5 (2022): 396–415. - PubMed

MeSH terms

Substances