Sustained allogeneic kidney graft operational tolerance despite discontinued conventional immunosuppression after CD19-CAR-T cell therapy for relapsed/refractory posttransplant lymphoproliferative disorder
- PMID: 40972901
- DOI: 10.1016/j.ajt.2025.09.009
Sustained allogeneic kidney graft operational tolerance despite discontinued conventional immunosuppression after CD19-CAR-T cell therapy for relapsed/refractory posttransplant lymphoproliferative disorder
Abstract
Management of immunosuppression after solid organ transplantation in context of chimeric antigen receptor T cell therapy (CART) is challenging. Although required to prevent graft rejection, systemic immunosuppression can interfere with biological functions of apheresis products and adoptively transferred T cells. We treated a 33-year-old kidney transplant recipient who developed relapsed/refractory posttransplant lymphoproliferative disorder with CD19-directed CART as a fourth-line therapy. Immunosuppression was discontinued before leukapheresis for CART and not reinitiated ever since. Although the posttransplant lymphoproliferative disorder remained in complete remission, we did not observe any signs of graft rejection (clinically and by determination of donor-derived cell-free DNA) until last follow-up at 23 months after CART. Phenotyping of peripheral blood immune cell subsets showed stable recovery of T and B cell compartments with dominant naïve differentiation. Immune responses against foreign antigens were shown by T cell cytokine production after stimulation with virus-derived peptide pools and absence of torque teno virus DNA. The lack of human leukocyte antigen antibodies and absence of T cell proliferation in a mixed leukocyte reaction with peripheral blood cells of the kidney donor confirmed tolerance against donor antigens. We envision CD19-directed CART as a therapeutic option to prevent organ rejection without conventional long-term immunosuppression in selected patients.
Keywords: CAR-T cell therapy; kidney transplantation; tolerance.
Copyright © 2025 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Conflict of interest statement
Declaration of competing interest The authors of this manuscript have conflicts of interest to disclose as described by American Journal of Transplantation. L.H. reports financial support by Deutsche Krebshilfe e.V. (70115705) and German Research Foundation (545913134); consulting or advisory fees Bristol Myers Squibb, Gilead, Johnson & Johnson, Pierre-Fabre, and Sanofi; and travel support from Amgen, Gilead, and Johnson & Johnson. D.W. reports research support from Novartis and honoraria from Novartis and Kite-Gilead. D.Z. reports advisory board participation in Apellis and Novartis and travel support from Boehringer Ingelheim. E.S. and J.B. are employees at Chronix Biomedical GmbH (an Oncocyte Company); hold stock or option ownership in Oncocyte, Inc; and are inventors on patents US11155872B2 and 10570443B2 and EP3004388B2 and 3201361B1. M.A.F. reports travel grants from Sanofi and honoraria from Sanofi and Novartis. M.O. is consultant of Insight Molecular Diagnostics, Inc Nashville TN, USA. M.P. reports travel grants and honoraria from Kite and Takeda. W.H. reports research support from Johnson & Johnson and travel grants from Amgen, Johnson & Johnson, and Servier.
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
