Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 2025 Oct 1;30(10):oyaf284.
doi: 10.1093/oncolo/oyaf284.

Phase I study of palbociclib with cisplatin or carboplatin in the management of patients with advanced pancreatic cancer

Affiliations
Clinical Trial

Phase I study of palbociclib with cisplatin or carboplatin in the management of patients with advanced pancreatic cancer

Olatunji B Alese et al. Oncologist. .

Abstract

Importance: The addition of agents targeting critical signal mediators of cancer cell proliferation such as cyclin-dependent kinases (CDK) potentiates the efficacy of platinum chemotherapy.ObjectiveTo determine the safety and efficacy of palbociclib combined with cisplatin (cis) or carboplatin (carbo) in advanced solid malignanciesDesignEnrollment on dose escalation (part I) proceeded using the Bayesian adaptive design Escalation with Overdose Control (EWOC).SettingSingle institution investigator initiated trial.

Participants: Patients with any advanced cancer after at least one prior therapy were enrolled on dose escalation to determine recommended phase II doses (RP2D). Expansion cohorts were then opened for pancreaticobiliary tract cancers.InterventionEscalating doses of palbociclib in combination with different doses of cisplatin or carboplatin.Main Outcomes and MeasuresPrimary endpoint was objective response rate (ORR). Secondary endpoints included safety, overall survival (OS), and progression-free survival (PFS).

Results: We enrolled 39 patients on dose escalation (part I) and 32 additional patients on dose expansion (part II). RP2D of palbociclib 100 mg on Day 2-22 + Cisplatin (cis) 60 mg/m2 IV on Day 1 Q4W (Arm A); and palbociclib 75 mg on Day 2-22 + Carboplatin (carbo) AUC 6 IV on Day 1 Q4W (Arm B). ORR for Part I were 12.5% (Arm A) and 25% (Arm B). Median PFS and OS for dose expansion were 2.1 and 4.9 months, respectively. For PDAC, mPFS was 1.9 months (95% CI: 1.7, 2.4), and OS was 3.7 months (95% CI: 2.7, 5.7). Most common treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs-all grade %): Arm A-neutropenia (66%), thrombocytopenia (26%), nausea, fatigue, and anemia (20% each); Arm B-neutropenia (64.7%), thrombocytopenia (53%), and anemia (29%). There were no grade 4-5 TRAEs.

Conclusions and relevance: The combination of palbociclib with cisplatin or carboplatin had an acceptable safety profile and clinical responses in some treatment refractory advanced cancers. There was no objective response, but about half of PDAC patients had disease stabilization. Additional efforts are needed to exploit CDK abnormalities in these patients. Clinical trial registration number: NCT02897375.

Keywords: CDK; clinical trial; palbociclib; pancreatic cancer; phase I; platinum.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

O.B.A. has declared the following conflicts: Research funding: Taiho Oncology, Ipsen Pharmaceuticals, GSK, Bristol Myers Squibb, Boehringer Ingelheim, Xencor Inc., ASCO, Cue Biopharma, Inc., Merck, Inhibitex Inc, Arcus Biosciences Inc., AstraZeneca, Loxo/Lilly Oncology; Consulting/advisory role: Ipsen Pharmaceuticals, GSK, Cue Biopharma, Inc., Abbvie, Taiho, Bristol Myers Squibb, AstraZeneca, Exelixis, Takeda, Boehringer Ingelheim, Loxo Oncology; Independent data monitoring committee: Compass Therapeutics, Inc. TKO reported research funding from Norvatis, Bayer, Regeneron, Astrazeneca, Amgen, Pfizer, Merck, Roche/Genentech, Cardiff Oncology, Ymabs, Boehringer Ingelheim and EMD Serono. TKO served as an advisor to Norvartis, Lilly, Eisai, BMS, Amgen, Astrazeneca, Bayer, Merck, Oncocyte, Takeda, Jazz, Zentalis, Ipsen, Beigene, Coherus.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Swimmer plot showing the length of duration of treatment for all the patients enrolled on both dose escalation and expansion.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Spider (A) and Waterfall plots (B) showing the best percent change from baseline (as assessed by the investigator) in target lesions for patients on the dose expansion cohort.
Figure 3.
Figure 3.
KM curves showing progression-free survival (A) and overall survival (B) for patients with PDAC.

References

    1. Siegel RL, Miller KD, Wagle NS, et al. Cancer statistics, 2023. CA Cancer J Clin. 2023;73:17-48. - PubMed
    1. Siegel RL, Miller KD, Fuchs HE, et al. Cancer statistics, 2022. CA Cancer J Clin. 2022;72:7-33. - PubMed
    1. Conroy T, Desseigne F, Ychou M, et al. ; PRODIGE Intergroup. FOLFIRINOX versus gemcitabine for metastatic pancreatic cancer. N Engl J Med. 2011;364:1817-1825. - PubMed
    1. Von Hoff DD, Ervin T, Arena FP, et al. Increased survival in pancreatic cancer with nab-paclitaxel plus gemcitabine. N Engl J Med. 2013;369:1691-1703. - PMC - PubMed
    1. O’Reilly EM, Lee JW, Zalupski M, et al. Randomized, multicenter, phase II trial of gemcitabine and cisplatin with or without veliparib in patients with pancreas adenocarcinoma and a germline BRCA/PALB2 mutation. J Clin Oncol. 2020;38:1378-1388. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

Associated data