Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 2025 Oct 1;30(10):oyaf288.
doi: 10.1093/oncolo/oyaf288.

SUNRISE-CRC: a randomized phase II study of high-dose intermittent sunitinib versus trifluridine/tipiracil in metastatic colorectal carcinoma

Affiliations
Clinical Trial

SUNRISE-CRC: a randomized phase II study of high-dose intermittent sunitinib versus trifluridine/tipiracil in metastatic colorectal carcinoma

Jorien B E Janssen et al. Oncologist. .

Abstract

Background: Patients with metastatic colorectal cancer often have poor or short responses to currently available therapies. Drug repurposing with alternative dosing schedules may offer unexpected clinical benefit, even for agents that previously failed for this indication.

Methods: We explored a high-dose treatment strategy for sunitinib, assessing its potential for both cancer cell killing and inducing immunogenic cell death in patient-derived tumor organoids (PDTOs) of metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). In a randomized clinical trial, we studied the efficacy of high-dose intermittent sunitinib (700 mg once every 2 weeks) in patients with advanced CRC compared to standard therapy with trifluridine/tipiracil. The primary outcome measure was progression-free survival (PFS); secondary outcomes included overall survival, safety and tolerability, quality of life, and exploratory biomarker analyses.

Results: While high, intermittent dosing was found to effectively kill PDTOs in vitro, no support for immunogenic cell death was found. In our clinical trial, among a total of 63 evaluable patients, median PFS was 2.8 months (95% CI 0.9-4.7) for the investigation arm compared to 1.9 months (95% CI 1.6-2.3) for the trifluridine/tipiracil group (P = .78, HR 1.22; 95% CI 0.73-2.04). The trial was halted prematurely due to toxicities: in particular, hemorrhage, fever and gastrointestinal adverse events.

Conclusion: High-dose intermittent sunitinib treatment did not improve PFS for patients with heavily pretreated mCRC compared to standard 3rd or 4th-line treatment with trifluridine/tipiracil, whereas significant toxicity was observed. In addition, this approach provoked no relevant immunological responses in vitro, discouraging further research for potential combinations with immunotherapeutics.

Identifier: NCT03909724.

Keywords: high-dose; metastatic colorectal cancer; patient-derived tumor organoids; tyrosine kinase inhibitors.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Investigating immunogenic cell death in HDST sunitinib-treated PDTOs. (A) Schematic for treatment and analyses of mCRC PDTOs. (B) PDTO viability effect after HDST sunitinib. Representative images for 3 h of 20 µM (Sun20) or control (DMSO)-treated PDTOs, taken 7 d after drug wash-out. (C) Representative western blots (n = 3) analysis of the expression of (phospho-)MLKL along with loading control in PDTOs after 6 h and 15 h of Sun20 and 20 µM osimertinib (Osi20). TSZ (TNF-α, SMAC mimetic LCL-161, and Z-VAD-FMK) treated HT29 cells were used as positive control. Additionally, low-dose (2 µM, Sun2, and Osi2) treatments were performed for 6 h. (D) Quantification of normalized relative protein expression from (C). (E) Enzymatic caspase-1 activity measured in PDTOs after 3 h and 24 h of Sun20. HT-29 treatments were 24 h. Experiments were performed with three replicates and repeated at least two times. (F) RT-qPCR measurement of expression of GSDMD relative to GAPDH in indicated PDTOs. * P < .05, ** P < .005 (One-way ANOVA with Dunnett’s multiple comparisons post hoc test).
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Survival outcomes of the sunrise trial. Progression-free survival (A) and overall survival (B) of patients (N = 63).

References

    1. Biller LH, Schrag D. Diagnosis and treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer: a review. JAMA. 2021;325:669-685. - PubMed
    1. Cervantes A, Adam R, Roselló S, et al. Metastatic colorectal cancer: ESMO clinical practice guideline for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. Ann Oncol. 2023;34:10-32. - PubMed
    1. André T, Shiu K-K, Kim TW, et al. Pembrolizumab in microsatellite-instability-high advanced colorectal cancer. N Engl J Med. 2020;383:2207-2218. - PubMed
    1. Tabernero J, Grothey A, Van Cutsem E, et al. Encorafenib plus cetuximab as a new standard of care for previously treated BRAF V600E-mutant metastatic colorectal cancer: updated survival results and subgroup analyses from the BEACON study. J Clin Oncol. 2021;39:273-284. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Mayer RJ, Van Cutsem E, Falcone A, et al. Randomized trial of TAS-102 for refractory metastatic colorectal cancer. N Engl J Med. 2015;372:1909-1919. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

Associated data